摘要
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Feb 2013Prospective Evaluation and Classification of Ureteral Wall Injuries Resulting from Insertion of a Ureteral Access Sheath During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Olivier Traxer and Alexandre Thomas Olivier TraxerOlivier Traxer Equal study contribution. Financial interest and/or other relationship with Coloplast, Socomed/Rocamed and American Medical Systems. More articles by this author and Alexandre ThomasAlexandre Thomas Equal study contribution. More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: The safety of using a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery remains controversial. Using a novel classification, we prospectively evaluated the incidence and severity of ureteral access sheath driven ureteral wall injury after flexible ureteroscopy for retrograde intrarenal surgery. Materials and Methods: Data on a total of 359 consecutive patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stone were prospectively collected at 2 academic centers. We propose what is to our knowledge a novel endoscopic classification of iatrogenic ureteral wall injury. Ureteral injuries after retrograde intrarenal surgery were assessed visually with a digital flexible ureterorenoscope. The primary outcome measure was the incidence and nature of ureteral injuries. We sought factors predisposing to such injuries. Results: Ureteral wall injury was found in 167 patients (46.5%). Severe injury involving the smooth muscle layers was observed in 48 patients (13.3%). Males vs females (p = 0.024) and older vs younger patients (p = 0.018) were at higher risk for severe ureteral access sheath related ureteral injury. The most significant predictor of severe injury was absent ureteral Double-J® stenting before retrograde intrarenal surgery (p <0.0001). Pre-stenting vs no pre-stenting decreased the risk of severe injury by sevenfold. Body mass index, a history of diabetes mellitus, vascular disease or abdominopelvic radiation therapy and operative time were not associated with severe ureteral injury. Conclusions: Ureteral access sheath use for retrograde intrarenal surgery should involve systematic visual assessment of the entire ureter to recognize severe ureteral injury. The incidence of severe ureteral injury is largely decreased by preoperative Double-J stenting. References 1 : Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy?. J Urol2001; 165: 789. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology2005; 66: 252. Google Scholar 3 : Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol2007; 21: 119. Google Scholar 4 : Management of ureteral injuries. Ann Chir2005; 130: 451. Google Scholar 5 : A review of ureteral injuries after external trauma. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med2010; 18: 6. Google Scholar 6 : Normal ureter size on unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol2004; 182: 1039. Google Scholar 7 : Laser Doppler flowmetric determination of ureteral blood flow after ureteral access sheath placement. J Endourol2002; 16: 583. Google Scholar 8 : Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol2009; 55: 1190. Google Scholar 9 : The argument against the routine use of ureteral access sheaths. Urol Clin North Am2004; 31: 83. Google Scholar 10 : Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology2003; 61: 518. Google Scholar 11 : Single-center clinical comparison of two reinforced ureteral access sheaths for retrograde ureteroscopic treatment of urinary lithiasis. Int Urol Nephrol2012; 44: 409. Google Scholar 12 : Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy in children. J Urol2011; 186: 1728. Link, Google Scholar 13 : Instrumentation in endourology. Ther Adv Urol2011; 3: 119. Google Scholar 14 : Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol2006; 20: 179. Google Scholar 15 : The difficult ureter: what is the incidence of pre-stenting?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2011; 93: 31. Google Scholar 16 : Advanced ureteroscopy: wireless and sheathless. J Endourol2006; 20: 552. Google Scholar 17 : Is stenting required before retrograde intrarenal surgery with access sheath. Indian J Urol2009; 25: 326. Google Scholar 18 : Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol2009; 182: 2768. Link, Google Scholar 19 : Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. J Endourol2011; 25: 751. Google Scholar 20 : Preoperative stent placement decreases cost of ureteroscopy. Urology2011; 78: 309. Google Scholar 21 : Passive dilation by ureteral stenting before ureteroscopy: eliminating the need for active dilation. J Urol2005; 174: 1079. Link, Google Scholar 22 : Prevalence and management of complications of ureteroscopy: a seven-year experience with introduction of a new maneuver to prevent ureteral avulsion. Urol J2012; 9: 356. Google Scholar 23 : Predictive factors for intraoperative complications in semirigid ureteroscopy: analysis of 1235 ballistic ureterolithotripsies. Urology2008; 72: 770. Google Scholar 24 : Elastin content of the renal pelvis and ureter determines post-pyeloplasty recovery. J Urol2005; 173: 962. Link, Google Scholar Departments of Urology, Academic Hospital of Tenon, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France, and University Hospital of Liège (AT), Liège, Belgium© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byHarper J, Desai A, Maalouf N, Yang H, Antonelli J, Tasian G, Lai H, Reese P, Curatolo M, Kirkali Z, Al-Khalidi H, Wessells H, Scales C, Reese P, Tasian G, Ziemba J, Funsten E, Mussell A, McCune R, Shah S, Jain A, Selman-Fermin A, Maalouf N, Antonelli J, Johnson B, Pearle M, Baker L, Piskator B, Obiaro J, Rangel C, Hill M, Harper J, Wessells H, Curatolo M, Edwards T, Sorensen M, Sweet R, Baxter T, Covert H, Ayala E, Flint L, Cho G, Marshall G, Desai A, Lai H, Du K, Mueller S, Black L, Klim A, Scales C, Al-Khalidi H, Corneli A, Reeve B, Weinfurt K, Yang H, Andersen D, Johnson L, Dodd A, Thompson O, Dombeck C, McKenna K, Swezey T, Kirkali Z and Mullins C (2023) Risk Factors for Increased Stent-associated Symptoms Following Ureteroscopy for Urinary Stones: Results From STENTSJournal of Urology, Sunaryo P, May P, Holt S, Sorensen M, Sweet R and Harper J (2022) Ureteral Strictures Following Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease: A Population-based AssessmentJournal of Urology, VOL. 208, NO. 6, (1268-1275), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022.Tapiero S, Kaler K, Jiang P, Lu S, Cottone C, Patel R, Okhunov Z, Klopfer M, Landman J and Clayman R (2021) Determining the Safety Threshold for the Passage of a Ureteral Access Sheath in Clinical Practice Using a Purpose-Built Force SensorJournal of Urology, VOL. 206, NO. 2, (364-372), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2021.Fulla J, Prasanchaimontri P, Rizk A, Loftus C, Remer E and Monga M (2020) Ureteral Diameter as Predictor of Ureteral Injury during Ureteral Access Sheath PlacementJournal of Urology, VOL. 205, NO. 1, (159-164), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021.Cooper J, François N, Sourial M, Miyagi H, Rose J, Shields J, Sharma N, Domino P, Otto B, Box G, Bird V, Posid T and Knudsen B (2020) The Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on the Development of Abnormal Postoperative Upper Tract Imaging after UreteroscopyJournal of Urology, VOL. 204, NO. 5, (976-981), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2020.Assimos D (2019) Re: A Prospective Study Analyzing the Association between High-Grade Ureteral Access Sheath Injuries and the Formation of Ureteral StricturesJournal of Urology, VOL. 202, NO. 3, (454-454), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019.Assimos D (2018) Re: Medical Impulsive Therapy (MIT): The Impact of 1 Week of Preoperative Tamsulosin on Deployment of 16-French Ureteral Access Sheaths without Preoperative Ureteral Stent PlacementJournal of Urology, VOL. 201, NO. 1, (25-25), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.Assimos D (2018) Re: Use of the Ureteral Access Sheath during Ureteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJournal of Urology, VOL. 200, NO. 4, (692-694), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.Koo K, Yoon J, Park N, Lee H, Ahn H, Lee K, Kim D, Cho K, Chung B and Hong C (2018) The Impact of Preoperative α-Adrenergic Antagonists on Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion Force and the Upper Limit of Force Required to Avoid Ureteral Mucosal Injury: A Randomized Controlled StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 6, (1622-1630), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018.Humphreys M, Shah O, Monga M, Chang Y, Krambeck A, Sur R, Miller N, Knudsen B, Eisner B, Matlaga B and Chew B (2017) Dusting versus Basketing during Ureteroscopy–Which Technique is More Efficacious? A Prospective Multicenter Trial from the EDGE Research ConsortiumJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 5, (1272-1276), Online publication date: 1-May-2018.Pais V, Smith R, Stedina E and Rissman C (2016) Does Omission of Ureteral Stents Increase Risk of Unplanned Return Visit? A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 5, (1458-1466), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016.Assimos D (2016) Re: Evaluation of Postoperative Hydronephrosis following Ureteroscopy in Pediatric Population: Incidence and PredictorsJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 4, (1258-1259), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016.Datta S, Solanki R and Desai J (2015) Prospective Outcomes of Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Consecutive Cohort StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 3, (741-746), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016.Kuntz N, Neisius A, Tsivian M, Ghaffar M, Patel N, Ferrandino M, Sur R, Preminger G and Lipkin M (2015) Balloon Dilation of the Ureter: A Contemporary Review of Outcomes and ComplicationsJournal of Urology, VOL. 194, NO. 2, (413-417), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015.Assimos D (2015) Re: Predicting an Effective Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion: A Bicenter Prospective StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 193, NO. 4, (1276-1276), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2015.Assimos D (2013) Re: Standardized Flexible Ureteroscopic Technique to Improve Stone-Free RatesJournal of Urology, VOL. 190, NO. 1, (157-157), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013. Volume 189Issue 2February 2013Page: 580-584 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsiatrogenic diseasewounds and injuriesureterureteroscopystentsMetricsAuthor Information Olivier Traxer Equal study contribution. Financial interest and/or other relationship with Coloplast, Socomed/Rocamed and American Medical Systems. More articles by this author Alexandre Thomas Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...