Assessment of a Bronchoscopy Simulator

医学 支气管镜检查 模拟 柔性支气管镜检查 物理疗法 医学物理学 外科 计算机科学
作者
David E. Ost,ANDREW DE ROSIERS,E. James Britt,Alan M. Fein,Martin Lesser,Atul C. Mehta
出处
期刊:American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine [American Thoracic Society]
卷期号:164 (12): 2248-2255 被引量:190
标识
DOI:10.1164/ajrccm.164.12.2102087
摘要

The study objective was to validate a flexible bronchoscopy simulator by determining if it could differentiate between expert and novice bronchoscopists. A subsequent evaluation phase was then done to determine whether use of the simulator would improve the rate of bronchoscopy skill acquisition for new pulmonary fellows. A multicenter prospective cohort study was performed using a bronchoscopy simulator. Three cohorts were evaluated based on the number of bronchoscopies previously performed: "experts" (> 500, n = 9), "intermediates" (25 to 500, n = 8), and "novices" (none, n = 11). Each participant performed two simulated cases with performance measures being recorded by the simulator. Performance measures that distinguished between groups were then used to evaluate the learning curve for new fellows training on the simulator. A randomized-controlled trial was then conducted comparing the quality of bronchoscopy performance for new pulmonary fellows who were trained either with conventional methods or with the simulator. Expert bronchoscopists performed better on the simulator than intermediates who performed better than novices in terms of procedure time, percentage of segments visualized, time in red-out, and wall collisions. Training of new fellows demonstrated that after performing 20 bronchoscopic simulations, the skill level acquired with the simulator significantly improved in terms of speed, percentage of segments visualized, time in red-out, and collisions. Fellows trained on the simulator performed better than fellows trained using conventional methods during their first actual bronchoscopies as assessed by procedure time (815 versus 1,168 s, p = 0.001), a bronchoscopy nurse's subjective quality assessment score (7.7 +/- 0.3 versus 3.7 +/- 2.5, p = 0.05), and by a quantitative bronchoscopy quality score (percentage of segments correctly identified/procedure time, 0.119 +/- 0.015 versus 0.046 +/- 034, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the bronchoscopy simulator was able to accurately assess bronchoscopy experience level. Training new fellows on the bronchoscopy simulator leads to more rapid acquisition of bronchoscopy expertise compared with conventional training methods. This technology has the potential to facilitate bronchoscopy training and to improve objective evaluations of bronchoscopy skills.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
情怀的应助被菠萝包采纳,获得10
1秒前
在水一方的应助被啦啦啦就好采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
dismember120发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
dismember120发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
dismember120发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
3秒前
十一发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ldp发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
xx发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
xuqiu完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
风吹而过完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
665221发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
jie完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Ronnie发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Rose完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
英姑的应助被bllnl1823采纳,获得20
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被谦让雁风采纳,获得10
8秒前
hellohql发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
小蘑菇的应助被叶子采纳,获得10
9秒前
gyyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
gzh完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被Keats采纳,获得10
10秒前
wys完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Triump1关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
yidi01完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
m弟发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
fanfan完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
顾矜的应助被一一采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Arbitrage Theory in Discrete and Continuous Time 500
Fortepian Chopina 400
A Silent Apostrophe:The Fayum Portraits 310
四川大学学位论文.郭瑞昂. 基于高压热扩散的n型磷掺杂金刚石半导体制备研究 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7832151
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9356044
关于积分的说明 20586481
捐赠科研通 7424502
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3336822
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2481346
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2357505