Hypertrophic Effects of Concentric vs. Eccentric Muscle Actions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

古怪的 同心的 偏心训练 医学 生物电阻抗分析 置信区间 随机对照试验 纳入和排除标准 磁共振成像 物理疗法 荟萃分析 物理医学与康复 内科学 放射科 病理 体质指数 数学 物理 替代医学 量子力学 几何学
作者
Brad J. Schöenfeld,Dan Ogborn,Andrew D. Vigotsky,Martino V. Franchi,JAMES KRIEGER
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:31 (9): 2599-2608 被引量:125
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001983
摘要

Abstract Schoenfeld, BJ, Ogborn, DI, Vigotsky, AD, Franchi, MV, and Krieger, JW. Hypertrophic effects of concentric vs. eccentric muscle actions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 31(9): 2599–2608, 2017—Controversy exists as to whether different dynamic muscle actions produce divergent hypertrophic responses. The purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the hypertrophic effects of concentric vs. eccentric training in healthy adults after regimented resistance training (RT). Studies were deemed eligible for inclusion if they met the following criteria: (a) were an experimental trial published in an English-language refereed journal; (b) directly compared concentric and eccentric actions without the use of external implements (i.e., blood pressure cuffs) and all other RT variables equivalent; (c) measured morphologic changes using biopsy, imaging (magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography, or ultrasound), bioelectrical impedance, and/or densitometry; (d) had a minimum duration of 6 weeks; and (e) used human participants without musculoskeletal injury or any health condition that could directly, or through the medications associated with the management of said condition, be expected to impact the hypertrophic response to resistance exercise. A systematic literature search determined that 15 studies met inclusion criteria. Results showed that eccentric muscle actions resulted in a greater effect size (ES) compared with concentric actions, but results did not reach statistical significance (ES difference = 0.25 ± 0.13; 95% confidence interval: −0.03 to 0.52; p = 0.076). The mean percent change in muscle growth across studies favored eccentric compared with concentric actions (10.0% vs. 6.8, respectively). The findings indicate the importance of including eccentric and concentric actions in a hypertrophy-oriented RT program, as both have shown to be effective in increasing muscle hypertrophy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
忧郁的猕猴桃完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
Khaos_0929发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
在水一方应助HJJHJH采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
zyj完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
如意代容完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
快乐的行云完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
sunny发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
zl发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
脑洞疼应助还没有采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
Lucas应助米歇尔采纳,获得10
7秒前
刘艺娜完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
LiShin发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
pan应助dhy采纳,获得10
7秒前
俭朴尔岚完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
辣汉三发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
ohnono发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
an完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
FashionBoy应助xxxllllll采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
着急的问凝完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
cao_ming完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
hanjja完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
小张发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
小马甲应助Idumori采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
hhc发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
平淡的井完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
XinyanYan完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
lanlan完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Basic And Clinical Science Course 2025-2026 3000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
Process Plant Design for Chemical Engineers 400
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5613781
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4698996
关于积分的说明 14899849
捐赠科研通 4737544
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2547228
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1511145
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1473636