Hypertrophic Effects of Concentric vs. Eccentric Muscle Actions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

古怪的 同心的 偏心训练 医学 生物电阻抗分析 置信区间 随机对照试验 纳入和排除标准 磁共振成像 物理疗法 荟萃分析 物理医学与康复 内科学 放射科 病理 体质指数 数学 物理 替代医学 量子力学 几何学
作者
Brad J. Schöenfeld,Dan Ogborn,Andrew D. Vigotsky,Martino V. Franchi,JAMES KRIEGER
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:31 (9): 2599-2608 被引量:125
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001983
摘要

Abstract Schoenfeld, BJ, Ogborn, DI, Vigotsky, AD, Franchi, MV, and Krieger, JW. Hypertrophic effects of concentric vs. eccentric muscle actions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 31(9): 2599–2608, 2017—Controversy exists as to whether different dynamic muscle actions produce divergent hypertrophic responses. The purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the hypertrophic effects of concentric vs. eccentric training in healthy adults after regimented resistance training (RT). Studies were deemed eligible for inclusion if they met the following criteria: (a) were an experimental trial published in an English-language refereed journal; (b) directly compared concentric and eccentric actions without the use of external implements (i.e., blood pressure cuffs) and all other RT variables equivalent; (c) measured morphologic changes using biopsy, imaging (magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography, or ultrasound), bioelectrical impedance, and/or densitometry; (d) had a minimum duration of 6 weeks; and (e) used human participants without musculoskeletal injury or any health condition that could directly, or through the medications associated with the management of said condition, be expected to impact the hypertrophic response to resistance exercise. A systematic literature search determined that 15 studies met inclusion criteria. Results showed that eccentric muscle actions resulted in a greater effect size (ES) compared with concentric actions, but results did not reach statistical significance (ES difference = 0.25 ± 0.13; 95% confidence interval: −0.03 to 0.52; p = 0.076). The mean percent change in muscle growth across studies favored eccentric compared with concentric actions (10.0% vs. 6.8, respectively). The findings indicate the importance of including eccentric and concentric actions in a hypertrophy-oriented RT program, as both have shown to be effective in increasing muscle hypertrophy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
梦梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
jiumi完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
阿涛发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
Hhhh完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被静翕采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
8秒前
嘻嘻哈哈的应助被mashibeo采纳,获得10
8秒前
怜熙发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
cdercder的应助被Oguri_Cap采纳,获得10
9秒前
hey发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
liu完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
SSSYX发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
胡图图完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
多亿点完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
热情友桃完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
mor完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
yang完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
Lebranium发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
班小班完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
litongkk完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
飘逸百褶裙完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
等待的三问完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
盈虚者完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
CodeCraft的应助被Bressanone采纳,获得10
21秒前
老温完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
默默孤云发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
Master_Ye完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
小豆包完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
小超人完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
薄荷奶绿完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
高贵听云完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
白云猎德完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Research Methodology: Best Practices for Rigorous, Credible, and Impactful Research 1000
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7782884
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9322273
关于积分的说明 20388512
捐赠科研通 7371482
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3320483
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2468525
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2336628