Comparison of perioperative blood loss of three different posterior nonfusion decompression operations for single-segment lumbar disc herniation

围手术期 减压 医学 腰椎间盘突出症 失血 腰椎 外科
作者
Liren Wang,Xing Guo,Zuoqing Song,Hui Tang,H. Henry Guo,Ying Li
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Neurology [Frontiers Media]
卷期号:16
标识
DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1551742
摘要

The perioperative blood loss of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID), unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) and open fenestration discectomy (OPD) was compared to provide reference for the selection of clinical surgical methods. The clinical data of 260 patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent PEID, UBE or OPD surgery from March 2020 to February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, including 100 patients who received PEID surgery, 100 patients who received UBE surgery, and 60 patients who received OPD surgery. Total blood loss and hidden blood loss were calculated according to the linear equation of circulating blood volume, and the hidden blood loss was statistically compared among the three groups. In terms of perioperative total blood loss and visible blood loss, the OPD group had the highest total blood loss (408.46 ± 116.89 mL) and visible blood loss (127.17 ± 24.22 mL), followed by the UBE group (304.46 ± 87.55 mL and 51.00 ± 11.15 mL respectively). The PEID group was the least (152.87 ± 54.48 mL and 18.75 ± 5.09 mL). Both the overall differences among the three groups and the pairwise differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). As for hidden blood loss, the results indicated significant differences between the PEID and UBE groups (p < 0.05), as well as between the PEID and OPD groups (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the OPD group and the UBE group (p = 0.22). In terms of operation time, UBE group had the longest operation time (129.67 ± 30.56 min), and OPD group had the shortest operation time (78.73 ± 11.80 min), with statistical difference (p < 0.05). In terms of perioperative blood loss, the PEID group was more minimally invasive than the UBE and OPD groups. Compared with OPD group, UBE group was less invasive, but did not significantly reduce the amount of hidden blood loss after surgery. In terms of operation time, UBE group had the longest operation time and OPD group had the shortest operation time. In terms of hospitalization days, OPD group had the longest hospital stay. In terms of total hospitalization cost, UBE group had the highest total hospitalization cost and PEID group had the lowest total hospitalization cost. The clinician should choose the appropriate surgical plan according to the actual situation of the patient to ensure the efficacy and safety of the operation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
吴畅完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
在水一方的应助被个性的西瓜采纳,获得10
刚刚
无限师完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
寒酥完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
孟严青完成签到,获得积分0
刚刚
诗蕊完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
大气的烧鹅完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
wayhome完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
机智博涛完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
平淡的荆完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
合适安白发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
明明完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
袋袋完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
平淡的翠安完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
vcvvvv完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Yang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
Yuzu完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
小怡完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
YXHTCM发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
签到完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
熊洋洋完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
1111完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
hyw完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
123发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
机智博涛发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
闪闪的逊完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
feezy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
高高珩完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
Ablebolt完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
贪玩的机器猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
看看看完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
FJX发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Nathan发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
lx的应助被火星上的小笼包采纳,获得20
8秒前
Cate完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Modern Artificial Intelligence 1000
Особенности технологий и методов информационно-психологических войн СССР с Великобританией и США в период 1939-1953 гг 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
A REVIEW OF THE V-22 DYNAMICS VALIDATION PROGRAM 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8130204
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9532438
关于积分的说明 21595606
捐赠科研通 7711965
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3418072
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2543766
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2459303