Amphotericin B is Still the Drug of Choice for Invasive Aspergillosis

作者
Brahm H. Segal,Thomas J. Walsh
出处
期刊:American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine [American Thoracic Society]
卷期号:174 (1): 102a-103 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1164/ajrccm.174.1.102a
摘要

We read with interest the recent article by Drs. Segal andWalsh, wherein the authors review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of invasive aspergillosis (1). The authors recommend voriconazole as the drug of choice in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. However, we do not agree with the recommendations of the authors that voriconazole be considered the new standard of care for invasive aspergillosis. We believe that it is too early to accept voriconazole as the drug of choice for invasive aspergillosis. Amphotericin B is a highly effective antifungal agent, and is used as the gold standard against which newer agents are compared in trials of antifungal drugs. The conclusion that amphotericin B is inferior to voriconazole is based on two published trials (2, 3); however, both the trials are limited by their study design (4). The first trial was flawed by its design in using the deoxycholate preparation without requirements for premedication (used for minimizing infusion-related toxicity), or substitutionwith fluid and electrolytes (to reduce nephrotoxicity) (2). Moreover, voriconazole was given on an average of 77 d, but amphotericin B was given only for 10 d, precluding any meaningful comparison of the two study drugs. The second trial was a noninferiority trial that compared voriconazole with liposomal amphotericin B as an empirical treatment of fever of unknown origin in neutropenic cancer patients (3). Despite misleading definitions, voriconazole was significantly inferior to amphotericin B (4, 5). In fact, there was less survival in the voriconazole group, and a claimed significant reduction in the so-called breakthrough fungal infections (defined as those confirmed more than 24 h postenrollment) in favor of voriconazole disappeared when baseline infections that persisted despite treatment (infections arbitrarily excluded from analysis) were included (4). Thus, the available evidence does not support a recommendation to use voriconazole instead of amphotericin B for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. To the contrary, amphotericin B is significantly more effective than voriconazole and is currently the drug of choice (6).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
欣喜访枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
完美世界应助wujin采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
邓青坤发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
Apricity发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
lili完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
雯雯发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
欧尼酱发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
我见春日明媚完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
嘟嘟许完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
斯文败类应助童梦采纳,获得30
9秒前
QQ发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
飘逸的乌完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
范小米完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
bamboo发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
陶醉妙松完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科目三应助善良的饼干采纳,获得10
14秒前
大雪纷飞发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
雯雯完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
anz完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
19秒前
张张完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
落寞招牌发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
搜集达人应助安静的牛马采纳,获得10
20秒前
尐吜渔完成签到 ,获得积分20
20秒前
伊布完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Felix完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
ninini完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
淡然冬灵发布了新的文献求助150
22秒前
23秒前
23秒前
不会啊救命完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
化工安全与环保 1000
Autoparametric Resonance in Mechanical Systems 1000
基于锂离子电池正极材料回收的绿色溶剂开发及工程化应用研究 800
Effects of Two Weeks of Red Light Therapy on Choroidal Thickness and Axial Length in Young Adults 700
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 600
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7654816
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9226044
关于积分的说明 19822407
捐赠科研通 7221226
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3279759
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2440248
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2279179