整流器(神经网络)
转换器
占空比
电压倍增器
电流(流体)
涟漪
电压
相(物质)
控制理论(社会学)
电气工程
计算机科学
物理
工程类
电压源
循环神经网络
机器学习
人工智能
随机神经网络
量子力学
控制(管理)
人工神经网络
跌落电压
作者
Cheng‐Tao Tsai,Jye-Chau Su,S.-Y. Tseng
摘要
This paper presents comparison between phase‐shift full‐bridge converters with noncoupled and coupled current‐doubler rectifier. In high current capability and high step‐down voltage conversion, a phase‐shift full‐bridge converter with a conventional current‐doubler rectifier has the common limitations of extremely low duty ratio and high component stresses. To overcome these limitations, a phase‐shift full‐bridge converter with a noncoupled current‐doubler rectifier (NCDR) or a coupled current‐doubler rectifier (CCDR) is, respectively, proposed and implemented. In this study, performance analysis and efficiency obtained from a 500 W phase‐shift full‐bridge converter with two improved current‐doubler rectifiers are presented and compared. From their prototypes, experimental results have verified that the phase‐shift full‐bridge converter with NCDR has optimal duty ratio, lower component stresses, and output current ripple. In component count and efficiency comparison, CCDR has fewer components and higher efficiency at full load condition. For small size and high efficiency requirements, CCDR is relatively suitable for high step‐down voltage and high efficiency applications.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI