Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making

背景(考古学) 医疗保健 卫生经济学 卫生行政 数据收集 经济评价 过程(计算) 检查表 计算机科学 环境经济学 管理科学 风险分析(工程) 经济 业务 心理学 统计 操作系统 古生物学 生物 微观经济学 认知心理学 经济增长 数学
作者
Emily Lancsar,Jordan J. Louviere
出处
期刊:PharmacoEconomics [Adis, Springer Healthcare]
卷期号:26 (8): 661-677 被引量:1651
标识
DOI:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004
摘要

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
Mishaoc发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
Orange应助呆萌熊猫采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
JackWang618完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
kaylaaa完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
黑夜做着白日梦完成签到,获得积分0
3秒前
3秒前
xyu发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
乐乐应助一二采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
Z1发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
hope发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
科目三应助风吹麦浪采纳,获得30
5秒前
今后应助风吹麦浪采纳,获得100
5秒前
大模型应助风吹麦浪采纳,获得30
6秒前
bkagyin应助风吹麦浪采纳,获得30
6秒前
乐乐应助风吹麦浪采纳,获得30
6秒前
无花果应助风吹麦浪采纳,获得50
6秒前
CodeCraft应助风吹麦浪采纳,获得100
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助su采纳,获得10
6秒前
An0805完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
杨洋发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
可爱的函函应助聪慧易文采纳,获得20
8秒前
HiQ发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
Aveline完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
mz完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
wanci完成签到,获得积分0
10秒前
serenity发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
KEHUGE发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
xyu完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Effects of Two Weeks of Red Light Therapy on Choroidal Thickness and Axial Length in Young Adults 700
Positive Art Therapy Theory and Practice 600
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Key mechanistic insights into the intramolecular C-H bond amination and double bond aziridination in sulfamate esters catalyzed by dirhodium tetracarboxylate complexes 500
The Neuroscience of Language 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7670984
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9238366
关于积分的说明 19895118
捐赠科研通 7240420
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3284878
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2443290
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2287036