German Acupuncture Trials (Gerac) For Chronic Low Back Pain<subtitle>Randomized, Multicenter, Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial With 3 Groups</subtitle>

医学 针灸科 干刺 置信区间 物理疗法 随机对照试验 腰痛 内科学 替代医学 病理
作者
M. Haake
出处
期刊:Archives of internal medicine [American Medical Association]
卷期号:167 (17): 1892-1892 被引量:726
标识
DOI:10.1001/archinte.167.17.1892
摘要

Background: To our knowledge, verum acupuncture has never been directly compared with sham acupuncture and guideline-based conventional therapy in patients with chronic low back pain.Methods: A patient-and observer-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted in Germany involving 340 outpatient practices, including 1162 patients aged 18 to 86 years (mean ± SD age, 50 ± 15 years) with a history of chronic low back pain for a mean of 8 years.Patients underwent ten 30-minute sessions, generally 2 sessions per week, of verum acupuncture (n=387) according to principles of traditional Chinese medicine; sham acupuncture (n=387) consisting of superficial needling at nonacupuncture points; or conventional therapy, a combination of drugs, physical therapy, and exercise (n = 388).Five additional sessions were offered to patients who had a partial response to treatment (10%-50% reduction in pain intensity).Primary outcome was response after 6 months, defined as 33% improvement or better on 3 pain-related items on the Von Korff Chronic Pain Grade Scale questionnaire or 12% improvement or better on the back-specific Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire.Patients who were unblinded or had recourse to other than permitted concomitant therapies during follow-up were classified as nonresponders regardless of symptom improvement.Results: At 6 months, response rate was 47.6% in the verum acupuncture group, 44.2% in the sham acupuncture group, and 27.4% in the conventional therapy group.Differences among groups were as follows: verum vs sham, 3.4% (95% confidence interval, -3.7% to 10.3%; P=.39); verum vs conventional therapy, 20.2% (95% confidence interval, 13.4% to 26.7%; P Ͻ .001);and sham vs conventional therapy, 16.8% (95% confidence interval, 10.1% to 23.4%; P Ͻ.001.Conclusions: Low back pain improved after acupuncture treatment for at least 6 months.Effectiveness of acupuncture, either verum or sham, was almost twice that of conventional therapy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
传奇3应助柔弱静柏采纳,获得10
1秒前
rookyben完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
韩莹莹完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
无花果应助KBRS采纳,获得10
5秒前
鼻毛好胜完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
活力老少女完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
有你的Nature接收信完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
所所应助大水牛姐姐采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
漂亮采白发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
核桃举报高山求助涉嫌违规
11秒前
13秒前
6宁发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
尊敬莺发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
lucky发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
18秒前
zhoumo发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
落后的孤云应助雨滴音乐采纳,获得50
19秒前
19秒前
张琳发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
abb完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
上官若男应助sdl采纳,获得10
21秒前
酷波er应助沉默的高山采纳,获得10
22秒前
顾矜应助stlibhgq采纳,获得20
22秒前
mzhang2发布了新的文献求助50
22秒前
在下天池宫人间行走完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
小蘑菇应助yingyun采纳,获得10
24秒前
Sailing发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
麻辣小龙虾完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
蟹黄小笼包完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
qinxiang发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
27秒前
6宁完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 500
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
DIPPR Project 801 - Full Version 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7767737
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9311262
关于积分的说明 20322524
捐赠科研通 7352659
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3315451
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2464733
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2330087