Assessment of five different guideline indication criteria for spirometry, including modified GOLD criteria, in order to detect COPD: data from 5,315 subjects in the PLATINO study

作者
Ana Paula Luize,Ana Maria Baptista Menezes,Rogelio Pérez‐Padilla,Adriana Muiño,María Victorina López,Gonzalo G. Valdivia,C Lisboa,María Montes de,Carlos Tálamo,Bartolomé R. Celli,Oliver A. Nascimento,Mariana Rodrigues Gazzotti,José Roberto Jardim,for the PLATINO Team
出处
期刊:npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine [Nature Portfolio]
卷期号:24 (1): 14075-14075 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.75
摘要

Spirometry is the gold standard for diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although there are a number of different guideline criteria for deciding who should be selected for spirometric screening, to date it is not known which criteria are the best based on sensitivity and specificity. Firstly, to evaluate the proportion of subjects in the PLATINO Study that would be recommended for spirometry testing according to Global initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)-modified, American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), National Lung Health Education Program (NLHEP), GOLD and American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria. Secondly, we aimed to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive and negative predictive values, of these five different criteria. Data from the PLATINO study included information on respiratory symptoms, smoking and previous spirometry testing. The GOLD-modified spirometry indication criteria are based on three positive answers out of five questions: the presence of cough, phlegm in the morning, dyspnoea, age over 40 years and smoking status. Data from 5,315 subjects were reviewed. Fewer people had an indication for spirometry (41.3%) according to the GOLD-modified criteria, and more people had an indication for spirometry (80.4%) by the GOLD and ATS/ERS criteria. A low percentage had previously had spirometry performed: GOLD-modified (14.5%); ACCP (13.2%); NLHEP (12.6%); and GOLD and ATS/ERS (12.3%). The GOLD-modified criteria showed the least sensitivity (54.9) and the highest specificity (61.0) for detecting COPD, whereas GOLD and ATS/ERS criteria showed the highest sensitivity (87.9) and the least specificity (20.8). There is a considerable difference in the indication for spirometry according to the five different guideline criteria. The GOLD-modified criteria recruit less people with the greatest sum of sensitivity and specificity. A new study reveals the most useful criteria for indicating spirometry testing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Spirometry, which assesses lung function by measuring how much air is inhaled and how quickly it is exhaled, is the most accurate diagnostic test for COPD but there are different criteria indicating its use. An international group of researchers led by José R. Jardim, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brasil, evaluated the proportion of individuals from a 5,315-patient study carried out in Latin America that met criteria for spirometry testing according to five different guidelines. They found that the modified GOLD (Global Initiative for COPD) criteria, which consider symptoms and history of flare-ups as well as the degree of airflow obstruction, are the most sensitive and specific for diagnosing COPD.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
aaaa的应助被朴素渊思采纳,获得50
1秒前
孟繁荣发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
汉堡包的应助被不期采纳,获得10
2秒前
hhhhhh发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
吃猫的鱼发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
wow发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
SciGPT的应助被高大的剑身采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
孟繁荣发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
优雅的幻香完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
jiangjing发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
畅快的饼干完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
卓头OvQ完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
Yotol发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
Yjh发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
共享精神的应助被ABBCCC采纳,获得10
13秒前
卓头OvQ发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
哆哆关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
领导范儿的应助被vv采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
孟繁荣发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
正直的hh发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
1433223发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
隐形曼青的应助被kk采纳,获得10
17秒前
zzz完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Management and the Arts 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (GGB), Band 5: Pro–Soz 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 7: R–S 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 1: A–B 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7818559
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9346744
关于积分的说明 20537446
捐赠科研通 7411201
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3332027
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2478263
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2351809