Surface roughness, optical properties, and microhardness of additively and subtractively manufactured CAD‐CAM materials after brushing and coffee thermal cycling

Tested additively manufactured resins can be considered more susceptible to simulated brushing and coffee thermal cycling than the other materials, given the fact that their surface roughness and ΔE00 values were higher than previously reported acceptability thresholds and because they had the lowest microhardness after all procedures were complete.