Blinding assessment in randomised sham-controlled trials of acupuncture:protocol for a systematic survey

作者
Jiahui Yang,Jiali Liu,Xiaochao Luo,Minghong Yao,Yong Fu,Ling Li,Xin Sun
出处
期刊:BMJ Open [BMJ]
卷期号:15 (1): e090238-e090238 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090238
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Although various sham acupuncture techniques have been employed to ensure blinding in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture, the effectiveness of blinding in these trials and its influence on trial effect size estimates remain unclear. The objectives of this study are the following: (1) to investigate the proportion and study characteristics of sham-controlled trials reporting on blinding assessment, (2) to assess the blinding effectiveness of different types of sham acupuncture, (3) to investigate the relationship between blinding effectiveness and effect sizes in acupuncture RCTs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed and EMBASE from inception to 1 January 2025 to identify RCTs that compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture in humans with any disease or symptom, with no restrictions on language. Paired investigators will independently determine eligibility and use pilot-tested standardised forms for data extraction. We will calculate the proportion of sham-controlled trials that assessed and reported blinding success and conduct descriptive analyses of general study characteristics, acupuncture treatment details, sham acupuncture details and blinding assessments for included trials. We will assess the effectiveness of blinding success using the James blinding index (BI) and Bang BI, and pool data from included trials using random-effects models. We will use Hedges' g, a standardised mean difference, with its 95% CI, to calculate treatment effects. We will use Pearson's r correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between blinding effectiveness and trial effect sizes when variable distributions meet the assumptions of normality and linearity; otherwise, we will consider employing non-parametric tests. When sufficient data are available, we will also use random-effects meta-regression to explore the relationship. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and condensed summaries for clinicians, health policymakers and guideline developers regarding the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of blinded assessment of sham acupuncture RCTs. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B3U7K).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被小明采纳,获得10
1秒前
nanting完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
在水一方的应助被你看你看采纳,获得10
3秒前
情怀的应助被小巧晓夏采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
曾经的溪流完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
搜集达人的应助被洋1采纳,获得10
4秒前
飞快的羊青完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
田幻雪发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
qiao完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
biu的应助被chenchen采纳,获得10
7秒前
一口啵啵发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Northing完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
yhy完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
xjx完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Linnet发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
古或今完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
忧伤的绝施完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
W sir发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
身体健康完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
何先生发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
Cc完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
嘟噜发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
wndswz给wndswz的求助进行了留言
15秒前
15秒前
洋1发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Litao完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
Cc发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
小巧晓夏发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Organizational Behavior 510
桑白皮エキスの実験的, 臨床的育毛効果について 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8043713
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9475822
关于积分的说明 21280821
捐赠科研通 7611659
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3391916
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2523524
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2429752