水热液化
生物炭
水热碳化
热解
液化
原材料
碳化
制浆造纸工业
废物管理
生物量(生态学)
生物燃料
氮气
能量回收
化学
热液循环
食物垃圾
水溶液
化学工程
有机化学
吸附
农学
统计
工程类
生物
数学
能量(信号处理)
作者
Bita Motavaf,Sofia H. Capece,Tomer Eldor,Phillip E. Savage
标识
DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00200
摘要
We carbonized simulated food waste (stage I) and then liquefied the biochar produced (stage II) with the goals of producing bio-oil and recovering nitrogen. Both stages used hydrothermal and pyrolytic approaches, so the influence of water during the treatments could be discerned. Pyrolysis produced biochars in the greatest yield (57 wt %) from the biomass feedstock, and it produced biocrudes with the greatest HHV (39.4 MJ/kg) via the liquefaction of biochar from hydrothermal carbonization. Pyrolysis of biochar for stage II gave negligible aqueous-phase product yields, however, which limited the nitrogen recovery with this approach solely to that recovered in the initial carbonization step. The highest N recovery (75%) in the aqueous-phase products occurred with hydrothermal treatment for both carbonization and liquefaction. This N recovery greatly exceeded those (<10%) for single-step hydrothermal liquefaction of this same feedstock. Energy recovery in the biocrude oil produced from this two-step process exceeded 50% in several runs. This two-step approach for food-waste valorization provides an opportunity for comparable energy recovery and much greater N recovery than are available from single-step hydrothermal liquefaction.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI