Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

加强流行病学观察研究报告 观察研究 检查表 概化理论 批判性评价 报告审判综合标准 语句(逻辑) 质量(理念) 心理学 医学教育 医学 替代医学 病理 政治学 法学 认知心理学 哲学 发展心理学 认识论
作者
Jan P. Vandenbroucke,Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Peter C Gøtzsche,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Stuart Pocock,Charles Poole,James J. Schlesselman,Matthias Egger
出处
期刊:Epidemiology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:18 (6): 805-835 被引量:2756
标识
DOI:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181577511
摘要

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers.This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
斯文败类应助sadsada采纳,获得50
刚刚
十二应助黑猫采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
快乐静枫发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助灵巧的丹珍采纳,获得10
2秒前
T1Oner完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
111完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
小丑完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
kkkk完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
rico发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
无心的冰枫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
去有你的季节完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
王贵平关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
6秒前
阿容发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
凡凡呀发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
CX完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Akim应助HWX采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
xiaohua完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
潇洒的惋清应助man采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
科研板砖发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
lzy完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
sadsada发布了新的文献求助50
13秒前
跳跃凡桃发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
打打应助QIN采纳,获得10
15秒前
雨木木完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
科目三应助OrangeY采纳,获得10
16秒前
orixero应助123123采纳,获得10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7763792
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9308167
关于积分的说明 20304138
捐赠科研通 7348527
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3314079
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2463790
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2328237