医学
微小残留病
内科学
免疫分型
肿瘤科
骨髓
诱导化疗
人口
化疗
免疫学
流式细胞术
环境卫生
作者
Jerzy Hołowiecki,Małgorzata Krawczyk-Kuliś,Sebastian Giebel,Krystyna Jagoda,Beata Stella‐Hołowiecka,Beata Piątkowska−Jakubas,Monika Paluszewska,Ilona Seferyńska,Krzysztof Lewandowski,Marek Kiełbiński,Anna Czyż,Agnieszka Balana-Nowak,Małgorzata Król,Aleksander B. Skotnicki,Wiesław Wiktor Jędrzejczak,Krzysztof Warzocha,Andrzej Lange,Andrzej Hellmann
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07185.x
摘要
Summary The treatment of adults with Philadelphia‐negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) depends on the presence of risk factors including age, white blood cell count, immunophenotype and time to complete remission. In recent years, status of minimal residual disease (MRD) has been postulated as an additional risk criterion. This study prospectively evaluated the significance of MRD. Patients were treated with a uniform Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG) 4‐2002 protocol. MRD status was assessed after induction and consolidation by multiparametric flow cytometry. Out of 132 patients included (age, 17–60 years), 116 patients were suitable for analysis. MRD level ≥0·1% of bone marrow cells after induction was found to be a strong and independent predictor for relapse in the whole study population ( P < 0·0001), as well as in the standard risk (SR, P = 0·0003) and high‐risk ( P = 0·008) groups. The impact of MRD after consolidation on outcome was not significant. The combination of MRD status with conventional risk stratification system identified a subgroup of patients allocated to the SR group with MRD <0·1% after induction who had a very low risk of relapse of 9% at 3 years as opposed to 71% in the remaining subjects ( P = 0·001). We conclude that MRD evaluation after induction should be considered with conventional risk criteria for treatment decisions in adult ALL.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI