ABSTRACT Reliable steady‐state testing protocols are crucial for accurately evaluating the performance of perovskite solar cells. In this study, we systematically compare the asymptotic P MAX scan and the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) method to assess their effectiveness in steady‐state efficiency measurements. We introduce the current density standard deviation factor as a stability criterion in the asymptotic P MAX scan, and implement a convergence amplitude to regulate the voltage adjustment speed toward the maximum power point. There is a possible tendency that the performance of state‐of‐the‐art perovskite solar cells improved in the asymptotic P MAX scan in low‐to‐high voltage directions. Numerical device simulations reveal that this improvement is due to a reduction in the trap state density in both the perovskite bulk and at the interfaces. We further compare asymptotic P MAX scans conducted in both low‐to‐high and high‐to‐low voltage directions, demonstrating their strong consistency and repeatability on state‐of‐the‐art perovskite solar cells. Our results show that the steady‐state P MAX obtained from the asymptotic P MAX scan closely matches, but can be slightly higher than, that from MPPT. This work provides a comprehensive evaluation of steady‐state testing methods for perovskite solar cells, offering a foundation for more accurate performance characterization and certification.