Intermediate-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Partial Nephrectomy Versus Cryoablation in Renal Tumors >3 cm: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

医学 低温消融 肾切除术 倾向得分匹配 泌尿科 外科 内科学 烧蚀
作者
Nicholas A. Pickersgill,Joel Vetter,Dylan J. Mittauer,L. A. Elson,Joshua Palka,Nimrod S. Barashi,Eric Kim,Ramakrishna Venkatesh,Sam B. Bhayani,R. Sherburne Figenshau
出处
期刊:The Journal of Urology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
标识
DOI:10.1097/ju.0000000000004524
摘要

No AccessJournal of UrologyOriginal Clinical Article12 Mar 2025Intermediate-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Partial Nephrectomy Versus Cryoablation in Renal Tumors >3 cm: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis Nicholas A. Pickersgill, Joel M. Vetter, Dylan J. Mittauer, Lauren Elson, Joshua K. Palka, Nimrod S. Barashi, Eric H. Kim, Ramakrishna Venkatesh, Sam B. Bhayani, and R. Sherburne Figenshau Nicholas A. PickersgillNicholas A. Pickersgill Corresponding author: Nicholas A. Pickersgill, MD, Urologic Oncology Fellow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065. Phone: (314) 366-0525. Email: ([email protected]) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9902-6603 , Joel M. VetterJoel M. Vetter Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA , Dylan J. MittauerDylan J. Mittauer Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA , Lauren ElsonLauren Elson Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA , Joshua K. PalkaJoshua K. Palka Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA Michigan Institute of Urology, Troy, MI, USA , Nimrod S. BarashiNimrod S. Barashi Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA , Eric H. KimEric H. Kim Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA , Ramakrishna VenkateshRamakrishna Venkatesh Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA , Sam B. BhayaniSam B. Bhayani Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA , and R. Sherburne FigenshauR. Sherburne Figenshau Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004524AboutPDF Cite Export CitationSelect Citation formatNLMAMAIEEEACMAPAChicagoMLAHarvardTips on citation downloadDownload citationCopy citation ToolsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Cryoablation (CA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) are effective nephron-sparing treatments for small renal masses. While guidelines list thermal ablation as an option for tumors <3 cm, limited data compare PN and CA in larger tumors. We compared intermediate-term oncologic outcomes between PN and CA in renal masses >3 cm. Materials and Methods: Patients treated with PN or CA for cT1/cT2, N0M0 renal masses >3 cm between 2006 and 2016 were identified. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:2 ratio for patients undergoing CA or PN based on age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), tumor size, and nephrometry score. Disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: One hundred thirteen and 57 patients underwent PN and CA with median follow-up of 4.5 and 3.8 years, respectively. CA was associated with significantly lower 5-year DFS compared to PN (75% vs. 94%, p<0.001). Local recurrence was more common after CA compared to PN (5.3% vs. 1.8%). Technical failure occurred with 32% of PCA. However, no significant differences were observed in 5-year MFS (100% for CA vs. 96% for PN, p=0.2) or CSS (100% for CA vs. 98% for PN, p=0.4). Conclusions: CA is associated with lower DFS but similar MFS and CSS compared to PN in renal masses >3 cm. CA is a viable option for well-selected patients with comorbidities or high surgical risk, when combined with salvage ablation as indicated. © 2025 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2025 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsrenal cell carcinomacryoablationpartial nephrectomy Author Information Nicholas A. Pickersgill Corresponding author: Nicholas A. Pickersgill, MD, Urologic Oncology Fellow, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065. Phone: (314) 366-0525. Email: ([email protected]) More articles by this author Joel M. Vetter Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA More articles by this author Dylan J. Mittauer Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA More articles by this author Lauren Elson Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA More articles by this author Joshua K. Palka Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA Michigan Institute of Urology, Troy, MI, USA More articles by this author Nimrod S. Barashi Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA More articles by this author Eric H. Kim Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA More articles by this author Ramakrishna Venkatesh Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA More articles by this author Sam B. Bhayani Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA More articles by this author R. Sherburne Figenshau Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
陈为东完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
金金金金完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
CodeCraft应助关天木采纳,获得30
2秒前
小枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
cannon8发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
陈为东发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
cannon8完成签到,获得积分0
10秒前
大个应助乙烯砜采纳,获得10
11秒前
听听完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
神外王001完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
ronnie完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
天真的振家完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
17秒前
陈陈陈完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
RRRZZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
陈陈陈发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
23秒前
卡卡完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
自由的迎南完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
小羊佳佳完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
30秒前
lily完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
33秒前
彭三忘完成签到,获得积分20
35秒前
sougardenist完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
清水小镇发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
45秒前
45秒前
qy发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
49秒前
s1ght发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
海城好人完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
JamesPei应助安静的忆山采纳,获得10
50秒前
Enoelle发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
爱听歌的孤容完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
万程完成签到,获得积分20
57秒前
穆奕完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
槿裡完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
科研通AI2S应助然然采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3779649
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3325127
关于积分的说明 10221379
捐赠科研通 3040230
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1668691
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798766
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758535