亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review

可靠性 斯科普斯 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 健康科学 质量(理念) 等级间信度 科学网 医学 质量评定 引用 医学教育 计算机科学 替代医学 荟萃分析 心理学 万维网 外部质量评估 病理 哲学 认识论 发展心理学 评定量表 政治学 法学
作者
Bingyan Li,Min Liu,Jia Liu,Yuxi Zhang,Wenjuan Yang,Lunfang Xie
出处
期刊:International Journal of Medical Informatics [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:186: 105426-105426 被引量:43
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426
摘要

The aims of this review are to clarify the current state of research in terms of assessment tools and assessors of the quality of health science-related short videos on TikTok, to identify limitations in existing research; and to provide a reference for future studies. A scoping review was conducted. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, and CBM databases were searched from September 2016 to November 2022. Manual searching was also performed to identify additional eligible studies. A total of 2620 documents were initially retrieved, and 29 were ultimately included. The literature was screened and collected, and data were extracted and summarized by 2 researchers. (1) The quality evaluation tools used in the 29 papers included the DISCERN, PEMAT(A/V), GQS, JAMA, HONcode, guidelines and self-developed tools. Twenty-six of the included articles used the DISCERN for quality assessment, which was the most frequently used evaluation tool. However, most of these tools were not developed to assess health science-related short videos, lacked credibility tests, and had poor applicability; therefore, the accuracy of the evaluation results might be biased. (2) The assessors of the quality of health science-related short videos on TikTok were mainly experts in related fields and medical students, with doctors (12/14) being the most common evaluators. Fifteen studies did not report the identity of the evaluators, and 12 studies did not report interrater reliability. This scoping review found that there is a lack of specific quality assessment tools for health science-related short videos on TikTok. Second, the current quality assessors of health science-related short videos on TikTok are limited. Future research should focus on the development of reliable, scientific quality assessment tools for health science-related short videos; unifying the evaluation standards; inviting users with different backgrounds and different health literacy levels to conduct quality assessments; exploring the quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok from different perspectives.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
15秒前
24秒前
忧郁小鸽子完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
48秒前
lucygaga完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
1分钟前
wanci应助王不留行采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
musclesheep发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
王不留行发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Hello应助Jx采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
何凡之完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
bkagyin应助飞快的映菱采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Jx发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
musclesheep完成签到,获得积分20
2分钟前
四氧化三铁完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
谦让烨华完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
摇匀发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
摇匀完成签到,获得积分20
2分钟前
丘比特应助摇匀采纳,获得10
2分钟前
sirwangmessi完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Copyright应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Copyright应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
du完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7257577
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8879520
关于积分的说明 18757219
捐赠科研通 6937984
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3201095
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375215
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2176943