Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review

可靠性 斯科普斯 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 健康科学 质量(理念) 等级间信度 科学网 医学 质量评定 引用 医学教育 计算机科学 替代医学 荟萃分析 心理学 万维网 外部质量评估 病理 法学 哲学 发展心理学 认识论 评定量表 政治学
作者
Bingyan Li,Min Liu,Jia Liu,Yuxi Zhang,Wenjuan Yang,Lunfang Xie
出处
期刊:International Journal of Medical Informatics [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:186: 105426-105426 被引量:43
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426
摘要

The aims of this review are to clarify the current state of research in terms of assessment tools and assessors of the quality of health science-related short videos on TikTok, to identify limitations in existing research; and to provide a reference for future studies. A scoping review was conducted. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, and CBM databases were searched from September 2016 to November 2022. Manual searching was also performed to identify additional eligible studies. A total of 2620 documents were initially retrieved, and 29 were ultimately included. The literature was screened and collected, and data were extracted and summarized by 2 researchers. (1) The quality evaluation tools used in the 29 papers included the DISCERN, PEMAT(A/V), GQS, JAMA, HONcode, guidelines and self-developed tools. Twenty-six of the included articles used the DISCERN for quality assessment, which was the most frequently used evaluation tool. However, most of these tools were not developed to assess health science-related short videos, lacked credibility tests, and had poor applicability; therefore, the accuracy of the evaluation results might be biased. (2) The assessors of the quality of health science-related short videos on TikTok were mainly experts in related fields and medical students, with doctors (12/14) being the most common evaluators. Fifteen studies did not report the identity of the evaluators, and 12 studies did not report interrater reliability. This scoping review found that there is a lack of specific quality assessment tools for health science-related short videos on TikTok. Second, the current quality assessors of health science-related short videos on TikTok are limited. Future research should focus on the development of reliable, scientific quality assessment tools for health science-related short videos; unifying the evaluation standards; inviting users with different backgrounds and different health literacy levels to conduct quality assessments; exploring the quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok from different perspectives.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
SciGPT应助Ttttttooooo采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
钱春霞发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
安详凡松完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
硕硕发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
马上毕业完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
风织花开完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
魏一完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
飞快的青柏完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
nianshu完成签到 ,获得积分0
3秒前
Ru发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
大大怪完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
蝎子莱莱启动完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
席茹妖完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
冷酷初南完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
端庄不愁完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
核桃发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
Wcy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Xf发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
12发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
Shy发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
遗落苏打完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
典雅寒风发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
FashionBoy应助谦让含桃采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
文武完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
站走跑完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
雯子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7745837
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9293714
关于积分的说明 20221401
捐赠科研通 7325384
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3307939
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2459916
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2319291