Characterizing growth and carcass composition differences in pigs with varying weaning weights and postweaning performance1

The unprecedented increase in litter size over the last decade has led to a perceived increase in the number of fallback pigs (Sus scrofa). However, there is little peer-reviewed data available regarding the biological differences between fallback pigs and their normal cohorts. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to identify differences in the biology and physiology, and thus the growth and metabolism, between pigs with varying weaning weights (WW) and postweaning performance. To accomplish this objective, a total of 120 barrows (PIC C22/C29 × 337) were used in growth and comparative slaughter experiments. Pigs were selected from a population of 960 weanling pigs to represent the 10% lightest, median, and heaviest pigs at weaning (n = 40 pigs per WW category). Eight pigs from each WW category were harvested on d 5 postweaning as the initial slaughter group (ISG). The remaining 96 barrows were housed in individual crates, fed ad libitum quantities of a common diet during a 27-d growth study, and were harvested on d 33 or 34 postweaning. After the completion of the live animal component of the experiment, pigs within each WW category were further stratified into the slowest, median, or fastest 33% ADG categories. This resulted in a total of 9 treatments in a nested design. Fallback pigs were designated as those belonging to the slowest ADG category from either the lightest or median WW categories. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with the fixed effects of WW category and WW(ADG). Although feed intake was maximized (P < 0.0001) by WW(ADG) category, feed efficiency was not different (P = 0.30). When equalized per unit of BW, WW(ADG) category greatly affected (P < 0.02) eviscerated carcass, organ, and metabolic BW, but not (P = 0.28) empty BW. There were no differences (P > 0.12) in tissue nutrient concentrations, ratios, or energy content among pigs in the growth experiment. All tissue deposition rates, which were calculated as the difference between tissue nutrient concentrations of the growth experiment and initial slaughter groups, were maximized (P < 0.0002) by WW(ADG), even when equalized per unit of BW. In conclusion, WW and ADG affect tissue accretion rates, but not feed efficiency or carcass composition in nursery pigs.