扎根理论
审查
三角测量
行动研究
相容性(地球化学)
认识论
社会学
计算机科学
管理科学
工程伦理学
定性研究
社会科学
数学
政治学
工程类
教育学
哲学
法学
化学工程
几何学
出处
期刊:The Canadian Journal of Action Research
[Nipissing University Library]
日期:2021-03-27
卷期号:21 (2): 4-24
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.33524/cjar.v21i2.485
摘要
This paper explores the prospects of combining Grounded Theory (GT) and Action Research (AR) methodologies to spark further methodological discussion. GT and AR methodologies are sometimes used together in the same study without a discussion of their methodological compatibility. However, different iterations of GT and various forms of AR may inform the level of mutual compatibility. The goal of this conceptual paper is to answer two questions: Which iteration of GT could be more compatible with which form of AR? What benefits and challenges would such a methodological combination pose? The author presents a brief comparative review of GT and AR approaches, commenting on the intriguing complementarities of these methodologies and the benefits of their triangulation in social research. The author concludes that, although the prospect of combining GT and AR is promising, it undeniably requires further scrutiny in the applied research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI