磁刺激
物理医学与康复
平衡(能力)
医学
刺激
冲程(发动机)
初级运动皮层
小脑
步态
神经科学
脑刺激
运动皮层
随机对照试验
电动机控制
运动功能
认知
物理疗法
荟萃分析
临床试验
中枢神经系统
康复
心理学
经颅直流电刺激
深部经颅磁刺激
小脑皮质
运动技能
临床疗效
运动学习
作者
Ningling Chen,Shuo Xu,Yilong Zou,Shaofan Chen,Xiujia Luo,Zhengcong Zhang,Tingting Chen,Huijie Zou,Xiaofen Xu,Haoqing Jiang
标识
DOI:10.1177/10538127261416002
摘要
BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive and painless technique used to modulate central nervous system activity. It has shown promise in improving motor, swallowing, speech, and cognitive functions in patients after stroke. However, limited research has focused on its effect on post-stroke balance, and stimulation parameters remain inconsistent.ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of rTMS on balance function in stroke patients by analyzing stimulation parameters, target sites, and clinical outcomes from recent RCTs, and to identify optimal evidence-based protocols for post-stroke balance rehabilitation.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for RCTs. Eighteen RCTs were included. All included studies demonstrated high methodological quality (PEDro scores ≥ 6).ResultsThe primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellum were the most frequently targeted stimulation sites. Most studies employed low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS) or iTBS. Across the included studies, rTMS demonstrated improvements in balance(BBS), lower-limb motor function(FMA-LE) and gait parameters compared with control groups (P < 0.05). Effect sizes varied depending on stimulation site and parameters. Clinical improvements were sustained across multiple assessment domains. Some studies reported a greater reduction in pdBSI in the rTMS group (mean difference: -0.12, 95% CI:-0.22 to -0.02, P = 0.026) and a smaller increase in MEP amplitude (mean difference: 8.5 μV, 95% CI:0.9 to 16.1 μV, P = 0.028).ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that rTMS targeting M1 or cerebellum may effectively improve balance in stroke patients. Preliminary evidence supports either (1) LF-rTMS to the unaffected M1 or (2) cerebellar iTBS as potentially effective protocols. However, further high-quality trials are needed to establish standardized treatment parameters.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI