Network meta‐analysis and systematic review comparing efficacy and safety between very high power short duration, high power short duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation

烧蚀 医学 持续时间(音乐) 心房颤动 内科学 心脏病学 荟萃分析 射频消融术 功率(物理) 量子力学 物理 文学类 艺术
作者
Nithi Tokavanich,Narut Prasitlumkum,Jakrin Kewcharoen,Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul,Jeerath Phannajit,Wisit Cheungpasitporn,Nazem Akoum,Ravi Ranjan,T. Jared Bunch,Leenhapong Navaravong
出处
期刊:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology [Wiley]
卷期号:34 (4): 869-879 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1111/jce.15831
摘要

Abstract Background High‐power short‐duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with a power of 40–50 W was proved to be safe and effective. Very high‐power short‐duration (vHPSD) AF ablation is a novel method using >50 W to obtain more durable AF ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vHPSD ablation compared with HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. Methods A literature search for studies that reported AF ablation outcomes, including short‐term freedom from atrial arrhythmia, first‐pass isolation (FPI) rate, procedure time, and major complications, was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. All relevant studies were included in this analysis. A random‐effects model of network meta‐analysis and surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were used to rank the treatment for all outcomes. Results A total of 29 studies with 9721 patients were included in the analysis. According to the SUCRA analysis, HPSD ablation had the highest probability of maintaining sinus rhythm. Point estimation showed an odds ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–1.9) between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation and an odds ratio of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.78–2.2) between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. While the odds ratio of FPI between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 3.6 (95% CI: 1.5–8.9), the odds ratio between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 2.2 (95% CI: 0.61–8.6). The procedure times of vHPSD and HPSD ablations were comparable and, therefore, shorter than that of conventional power ablation. Major complications were low in all techniques. Conclusion vHPSD ablation did not yield higher efficacy than HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. With the safety concern, vHPSD ablation outcomes were comparable with those of other techniques.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
徐自豪完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
在水一方应助Ssyong采纳,获得30
刚刚
ZRBY完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
绕越关注了科研通微信公众号
刚刚
wzwz发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
发顶刊的氧化钴完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xixi完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
充电宝应助纯情的天蓝采纳,获得10
1秒前
lgh发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
lio发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
JJJJJJJJJ完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
蝉鸣一夏发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
zzn完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
木头完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
共享精神应助蔚欢采纳,获得10
2秒前
小潘同学完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
光亮的天川完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
天天快乐应助小满采纳,获得10
3秒前
CipherSage应助Tony采纳,获得10
3秒前
Willows完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
SciGPT应助初景采纳,获得10
3秒前
Nature已接受完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
孤独晓绿完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
和谐的大船完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
幸会完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
xixi发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Jasper应助clcl采纳,获得10
4秒前
草莓雪酪完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
海绵发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
jack完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
南巷完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Hello应助平常母鸡采纳,获得10
5秒前
太叔岱周发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
满意血茗完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders: Interdisciplinary Perspectives 750
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7732896
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9283753
关于积分的说明 20160126
捐赠科研通 7310603
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3304194
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457051
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2313410