Effect of standard wound dressing versus prophylactic closed incision negative-pressure therapy on surgical-site infection after open incisional hernia repair: multicentre randomized clinical trial

作者
Mads Marckmann,Nadia A. Henriksen,Peter‐Martin Krarup,Frederik Helgstrand,Peter Vester‐Glowinski,Mette Willaume Christoffersen,Kristian K. Jensen
出处
期刊:British Journal of Surgery [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:112 (12)
标识
DOI:10.1093/bjs/znaf230
摘要

Abstract Background The benefit of closed incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) after open incisional hernia repair in reducing surgical-site infection (SSI) is uncertain. Methods The PROPRESS multicentre RCT was conducted from 1 March 2023 to 25 June 2024 at three Danish hospitals. Patients undergoing elective open incisional hernia repair were randomized to ciNPT or a standard wound dressing (SWD). The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI at 30 days. Secondary outcomes at 30 days included the pooled incidence of surgical-site occurrences (SSOs), patient-reported quality of life (QoL), and patient-reported scar assessment. The last follow-up date was 25 July 2024. Results A total of 110 patients were randomized (54 SWD patients and 56 ciNPT patients; median age of 63.9 (interquartile range 50.7–69.0) years; 45 (40.1%) were female) and 108 (98.2%) completed follow-up at 30 days. In total, 7 of the 110 patients (6.4%) were smokers, the mean(s.d.) BMI was 29.3(4.1) kg/m2, and the mean(s.d.) horizontal defect size was 8.7(4.7) cm. One death in each group was unrelated to the intervention, but surgery and anaesthesia may have been predisposing factors for mortality. There was no difference in SSI rates; 4 of 53 patients (8%) in the SWD group versus 7 of 55 patients (13%) in the ciNPT group (P = 0.673). With regard to SSOs, these affected 12 of 53 patients (23%) in the SWD group versus 14 of 55 patients (26%) in the ciNPT group (P = 0.907). There was no difference in scar scores (equal mean scores of 24; P = 0.892) and overall QoL improved significantly (mean score difference: −12.8 (95% c.i. −15.4 to −10.2); P < 0.001) without a difference between the groups (mean score change: SWD −12.6 versus ciNPT −13.0; P = 0.874). Conclusion ciNPT did not reduce SSI after open incisional hernia repair in this RCT, which was limited by the relatively small number of patients. Registration number NCT05050786 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
华仔应助王蕊采纳,获得10
刚刚
JamesPei应助容荣采纳,获得10
刚刚
syue完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Yying发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Mu丶tou发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
科研通AI6.2应助浩仔采纳,获得10
2秒前
Lucas应助Ausna采纳,获得10
3秒前
syll完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
okkkura发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
新兴领袖发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
5秒前
Meteor完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
ww完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
汉堡包应助谨慎的涵柏采纳,获得10
8秒前
小橘完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
我是老大应助一天八杯水采纳,获得10
9秒前
royan完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
邓佳鑫Alan应助qqqwww采纳,获得20
10秒前
阿泽发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
充电宝应助李芳洁采纳,获得10
11秒前
s5228201完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
王蕊发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
libangle发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
CodeCraft应助英勇的书本采纳,获得10
14秒前
脑洞疼应助活力的语堂采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
傻傻的香菱关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
pincoudegushi完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
bkagyin应助okkkura采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
sn完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
17秒前
满意盼山发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5963795
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7226786
关于积分的说明 15967664
捐赠科研通 5100103
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2740113
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1702961
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1619440