Objective To observe the effect of intravenous thrombolysis on TIMI flow of acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods A total of 229 patients with AMI analysed retrospectively were divided into two groups:intravenous thrombolysis(IVT)group(n=131)and primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)group(n=98).The treatment time and acute-phase outcomes were compared between the IVT group and the PCI group;104 patients in the IVT group received rescued or delayed PCI(IVT+PCI);TIMI flow was analysed between the IVT+PCI group and the PCI group.Results The time from the emergency room door to initiation of treatment was shorter in the IVT group than in the PCI group(67.79 min vs 134.54 min,P=0.000).At the initial coronary angiography,TIMI 3 flow and TIMI 2+3 flow were higher in the IVT+PCI group than in the PCI group(40.4% vs 24.5%,P=0.016;63.5% vs 36.7%,P=0.000 respectively).There was no significant difference between the IVT group and the PCI group in terms of major adverse cardiac events(MACE).Conclusion IVT as an initial treatment for AMI might achieve earlier reperfusion at TIMI≥2 flow,and it should be popularized in the primary hospitals.