狼牙棒
医学
内科学
心脏病学
危险系数
易损斑块
颈总动脉
冠状动脉疾病
不利影响
颈动脉
置信区间
心肌梗塞
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
作者
M. Matangi,Marie‐France Hétu,D. Armstrong,Jonas Shellenberger,D. Brouillard,Josh Baker,Ana Johnson,Nicholas Grubic,Hannah Willms,Amer M. Johri
标识
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeae153
摘要
Abstract Aims Atherosclerotic carotid plaque assessments have not been integrated into routine clinical practice due to the time-consuming nature of both imaging and measurements. Plaque score, Rotterdam method, is simple, quick, and only requires 4–6 B-mode ultrasound images. The aim was to assess the benefit of plaque score in a community cardiology clinic to identify patients at risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods and results Patients ≥ 40 years presenting for risk assessment were given a carotid ultrasound. Exclusions included a history of vascular disease or MACE and being >75 years. Kaplan–Meier curves and hazard ratios were performed. The left and right common carotid artery (CCA), bulb, and internal carotid artery were given 1 point per segment if plaque was present (plaque scores 0–6). Administrative data holdings at ICES were used for 10-year event follow-up. Of 8472 patients, 60% were females (n = 5121). Plaque was more prevalent in males (64% vs. 53.9%; P < 0.0001). The 10-year MACE cumulative incidence estimate was 6.37% with 276 events (males 6.9% vs. females 6.0%; P = 0.004). Having both maximal CCA intima media thickness < 1.00 mm and plaque score = 0 was associated with less events. A plaque score < 2 was associated with a low 10-year event rate (4.1%) compared with 2–4 (8.7%) and 5–6 (20%). Conclusion A plaque score ≥ 2 can re-stratify low–intermediate risk patients to a higher risk for events. Plaque score may be used as a quick assessment in a cardiology office to guide treatment management of patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI