Depression Screening Tools for Patients with Kidney Failure

医学 贝克抑郁量表 心理信息 萧条(经济学) 医疗补助 梅德林 人口 重症监护医学 精神科 医疗保健 环境卫生 政治学 法学 焦虑 经济 宏观经济学 经济增长
作者
Karli Kondo,Jennifer R. Antick,Chelsea Ayers,Devan Kansagara,Pavan Chopra
出处
期刊:Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:15 (12): 1785-1795 被引量:32
标识
DOI:10.2215/cjn.05540420
摘要

Background and objectives Patients with kidney failure experience depression at rates higher than the general population. Despite the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ ESRD Quality Incentive Program requirements for routine depression screening for patients with kidney failure, no clear guidance exists. Design, setting, participants, & measurements For this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and other databases from inception to June 2020. Two investigators screened all abstracts and full text. We included studies assessing patients with kidney failure and compared a tool to a clinical interview or another validated tool ( e.g ., Beck Depression Inventory II). We abstracted data related to sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and the area under the curve. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Results A total of 16 studies evaluated the performance characteristics of depression assessment tools for patients with kidney failure. The Beck Depression Inventory II was by far the best studied. A wide range of thresholds were reported. Shorter tools in the public domain such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 and Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (adults over 60) performed well but were not well studied. Short tools such as the Beck Depression Inventory–Fast Screen may be a good option for an initial screen. Conclusions There is limited research evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of most screening tools for depression in patients with kidney failure, and existing studies may not be generalizable to US populations. Studies suffer from limitations related to methodology quality and/or reporting. Future research should target widely used, free tools such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 2 and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020140227.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
liuxh123发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
星夜完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
4秒前
8秒前
zz完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
sxin发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
hrbykdxly完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
jiaojiao完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
小蘑菇应助zhq采纳,获得10
14秒前
曹梦梦完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
聪慧芷巧发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
聪慧芷巧发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
zhangheng发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
小乔同学完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
kangkang完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
NexusExplorer应助mins采纳,获得10
20秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助Meidina采纳,获得10
21秒前
liuxh123完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
今后应助Ade阿德采纳,获得10
23秒前
lijunliang完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
PanCiro发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
28秒前
28秒前
123发布了新的文献求助20
29秒前
melo完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
Billy应助Rigel采纳,获得30
30秒前
于于于发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
32秒前
mins发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
35秒前
38秒前
123完成签到,获得积分20
39秒前
39秒前
Ade阿德发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
钦影发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
Kenny完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
高分求助中
Chinesen in Europa – Europäer in China: Journalisten, Spione, Studenten 500
Arthur Ewert: A Life for the Comintern 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi // Kurt Werner Radtke 500
Two Years in Peking 1965-1966: Book 1: Living and Teaching in Mao's China // Reginald Hunt 500
Epigenetic Drug Discovery 500
Hardness Tests and Hardness Number Conversions 300
Knowledge management in the fashion industry 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3816948
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3360399
关于积分的说明 10407721
捐赠科研通 3078337
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1690720
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 814023
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 767985