Depression Screening Tools for Patients with Kidney Failure

医学 贝克抑郁量表 心理信息 萧条(经济学) 医疗补助 梅德林 人口 重症监护医学 精神科 医疗保健 环境卫生 政治学 法学 焦虑 经济 宏观经济学 经济增长
作者
Karli Kondo,Jennifer R. Antick,Chelsea Ayers,Devan Kansagara,Pavan Chopra
出处
期刊:Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:15 (12): 1785-1795 被引量:32
标识
DOI:10.2215/cjn.05540420
摘要

Background and objectives Patients with kidney failure experience depression at rates higher than the general population. Despite the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ ESRD Quality Incentive Program requirements for routine depression screening for patients with kidney failure, no clear guidance exists. Design, setting, participants, & measurements For this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and other databases from inception to June 2020. Two investigators screened all abstracts and full text. We included studies assessing patients with kidney failure and compared a tool to a clinical interview or another validated tool ( e.g ., Beck Depression Inventory II). We abstracted data related to sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and the area under the curve. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Results A total of 16 studies evaluated the performance characteristics of depression assessment tools for patients with kidney failure. The Beck Depression Inventory II was by far the best studied. A wide range of thresholds were reported. Shorter tools in the public domain such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 and Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (adults over 60) performed well but were not well studied. Short tools such as the Beck Depression Inventory–Fast Screen may be a good option for an initial screen. Conclusions There is limited research evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of most screening tools for depression in patients with kidney failure, and existing studies may not be generalizable to US populations. Studies suffer from limitations related to methodology quality and/or reporting. Future research should target widely used, free tools such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 2 and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020140227.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
难逃月色完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
sunny完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
岚47完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
新宇星辰完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
曲奇曲奇完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
wkc发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
解之完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
星辰完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
细腻灵雁完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
reubenxq完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
heitao完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
老迟到的贝壳完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
田様应助dan采纳,获得10
7秒前
纯真冰露完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
zmh完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
HAOYUN完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
烟花应助Hang采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
MR_芝欧完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
李易臻完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
zhaolihua发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
幸福的鑫鹏完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
happynewyear完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
满意的伊完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
wkc完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
woshiwuziq发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
儒雅的凝旋完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
畔畔应助一人做事一人汤采纳,获得30
11秒前
silencemch完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
JOE完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
o椰发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Akim应助WJ采纳,获得10
12秒前
大模型应助Mrshi采纳,获得10
12秒前
wz发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
名字是乱码完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7291063
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8910049
关于积分的说明 18858917
捐赠科研通 6958461
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3209242
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378998
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184974