Depression Screening Tools for Patients with Kidney Failure

医学 贝克抑郁量表 心理信息 萧条(经济学) 医疗补助 梅德林 人口 重症监护医学 精神科 医疗保健 环境卫生 政治学 法学 焦虑 经济 宏观经济学 经济增长
作者
Karli Kondo,Jennifer R. Antick,Chelsea Ayers,Devan Kansagara,Pavan Chopra
出处
期刊:Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:15 (12): 1785-1795 被引量:32
标识
DOI:10.2215/cjn.05540420
摘要

Background and objectives Patients with kidney failure experience depression at rates higher than the general population. Despite the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ ESRD Quality Incentive Program requirements for routine depression screening for patients with kidney failure, no clear guidance exists. Design, setting, participants, & measurements For this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and other databases from inception to June 2020. Two investigators screened all abstracts and full text. We included studies assessing patients with kidney failure and compared a tool to a clinical interview or another validated tool ( e.g ., Beck Depression Inventory II). We abstracted data related to sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and the area under the curve. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Results A total of 16 studies evaluated the performance characteristics of depression assessment tools for patients with kidney failure. The Beck Depression Inventory II was by far the best studied. A wide range of thresholds were reported. Shorter tools in the public domain such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 and Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (adults over 60) performed well but were not well studied. Short tools such as the Beck Depression Inventory–Fast Screen may be a good option for an initial screen. Conclusions There is limited research evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of most screening tools for depression in patients with kidney failure, and existing studies may not be generalizable to US populations. Studies suffer from limitations related to methodology quality and/or reporting. Future research should target widely used, free tools such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 2 and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020140227.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
心在鹿上发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Lucas应助JYOHS采纳,获得10
1秒前
漫漫完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Hedy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
科研通AI6.2应助康康采纳,获得10
3秒前
无极微光应助出其东门采纳,获得20
3秒前
积极觅夏发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
汉堡包应助坦率土豆采纳,获得10
4秒前
丘比特应助卑微打工人采纳,获得10
4秒前
英勇觅夏发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Hello应助欣喜的香彤采纳,获得10
4秒前
蔡蔡完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
火力全开完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
彭于晏应助专一的定帮采纳,获得20
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
wanglejia完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Aurora发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
可爱的函函应助杜拉拉采纳,获得20
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
Hello应助8787采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
Qst完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
山猫完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
龟龟发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
深情安青应助YU采纳,获得10
12秒前
婉转完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
小小发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
LwlyDm发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
coco发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
星星完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7292231
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8911221
关于积分的说明 18864022
捐赠科研通 6959430
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3209585
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2379096
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2185401