[Current status of palliative care for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer in China: a questionnaire-based survey].

医学 结直肠癌 问卷调查 缓和医疗 中国 肿瘤科 中国社会 性能状态 家庭医学 癌症 内科学 普通外科 护理部 总体生存率 政治学 社会学 社会科学 法学
作者
Fang Wang,Da-Long Chen,Zheng Wang,Yanxia He,Jin Li,S Z Zhang,Gong Chen,Jianmin Xu,Xianglin Yuan,Y Q Zhang,R-H. Xu
出处
期刊:PubMed [National Institutes of Health]
卷期号:27 (7): 718-725
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240323-00107
摘要

Objective: To analyze the current adoption of palliative care by patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in China. Methods: From 1 March 2023 to 30 June 2023, a questionnaire survey was conducted by random sampling. An exclusive research platform for the Blue Book on Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. An online questionnaire was sent to medical oncologists (including chief physicians, associate chief physicians, attending physicians and residents) in general hospitals and oncology hospitals in four major regions of East, Central, South and Northeast China. The questionnaire contained 28 questions requesting basic information about doctors, the number of patients with mCRC, the status of treatment from first to fourth line and beyond, points concerning treatment of pain in patients with mCRC, and expectations for the future. A medical team was responsible for the quality control of data collected, whereas statisticians performed the data cleaning and sorting and statistical analysis. Results: A total of 300 clinical questionnaires were collected, including 217 (72%) from doctors in general hospitals and 83 (28%) from doctors in oncology hospitals. Senior physicians (including associate chief physicians and chief physicians) accounted for 65% of the respondents, attending physicians 30%, and residents 5%. Within 3 months (average for each month), 46.4±26.6% patients were diagnosed with recurrent or unresectable mCRC by each physician, 51.6±26.8% of the patients being in cancer hospitals and 44.4±26.3% in general hospitals. One hundred percent of patients receiving first-line treatment received palliative care, as did 80.3% of those receiving second-line treatment, 58.2% of those receiving third-line treatment, and 35.1% of those receiving ≥fourth-line treatment. The primary factor governing selection of first-line treatment was guideline recommendations, whereas comorbidities and the patients' physical status dictated second line to fourth line treatment. Standard first-line treatment was administered to 93.8% of eligible patients, standard second-line treatment to 94.3%; and standard third-line treatment to 73.5%. First-line therapy included targeted therapy in 63.6% of patients and immunotherapy in 2.8%; second-line therapy included targeted therapy in 63.0% of patients and immunotherapy in 2.0%; third-line therapy included targeted therapy in 59.2% of patients and immunotherapy in 2.2%; and fourth-line therapy included targeted therapy in 48.7% of patients and immunotherapy in 3.1%. First-line treatment lasted an average of 9.6 months, second-line treatment 6.7 months, third-line treatment 4.9 months, and fourth-line treatment 3.7 months. More than 70% of the patients maintained a good quality of life after receiving first and second-line treatment and more than 60% of them had ECOG performance scores of 0-1. After receiving third- and fourth-line treatment, 50%-60% of patients maintained a good quality of life and 40%-50% of them maintained ECOG performance scores of 0-1. The survey also revealed that the main deficiencies in treatment were limited effectiveness of third-line treatment, insufficient availability and opportunity for clinical research, popularity of new drugs or new drug combination strategies, and limited channels for participation in multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment. Clinicians reported looking forward to participating in more clinical research on new drugs, hearing about the experience of experts in the field, and discovery of new targets and new drugs that increased the options for posterior line treatment of colorectal cancer. Conclusions: This report objectively summarizes the current situation, treatment difficulties, and expectations of frontline physicians concerning management of mCRC, thus providing a basis for decision-making and future direction for the diagnosis and research on treatment of mCRC.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Cinderella完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
清脆大树完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
缓慢珠发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
传奇3应助愤怒也哈哈采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
sjxjjxj完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
MozzieMiao举报求助违规成功
6秒前
我能私信骂你吗举报求助违规成功
6秒前
iitj举报求助违规成功
6秒前
二十八画生完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
英姑应助wangq采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
奥拉同学完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
pan发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
gmh253发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
杜杜发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
充电宝应助简单的如松采纳,获得10
13秒前
星辰大海应助缓慢珠采纳,获得10
13秒前
eddie完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Survivor完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
樊小雾发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
韩小孟发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
海苔小贝发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7746549
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9294420
关于积分的说明 20224582
捐赠科研通 7326479
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3308115
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2460125
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2319789