Comparison of exergames versus conventional exercises on the cognitive skills of older adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis

斯特罗普效应 心理学 认知 蒙特利尔认知评估 科克伦图书馆 物理疗法 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 物理医学与康复 医学 认知障碍 精神科 内科学
作者
Vinícius Nagy Soares,Hélio Mamoru Yoshida,Thaís Sporkens-Magna,Ricardo Aurélio Carvalho Sampaio,Paula Teixeira Fernandes
出处
期刊:Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:97: 104485-104485 被引量:50
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104485
摘要

• Exergames and conventional physical exercises improve cognitive performance in older adults. • Exergames appear to be more effective on global cognitive performance than conventional physical training. • The differences seem to decrease when conventional exercise has high cognitive demand. • Individual studies found neurophysiological benefits in favor of exergames. To compare the effects of exergames versus conventional physical training on the cognitive skills of older adults. Scientific studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Individual studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE Pro). The cognitive outcomes were Trail Making Test (TMT)-A, TMT-B, Stroop Word-Color test, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). We identified 256 studies, in which 13 studies were included in the systematic review and 11 in the meta-analysis. The majority of the exergame interventions were based on the Xbox 360′s Kinect, followed by the Impact Dance Platform, Nintendo Wii, and the Bike Labyrinth. We observed heterogeneity in the conventional exercise group and in the duration of training, which ranged from 12 to 52 sessions. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in TMT-A (p=0.083), TMT-B (p=0.122), and Stroop (p=0.191). There were differences in favor of exergames in MMSE (raw mean difference=-1.58, 95% CI: -2.87 to -0.28, p<0.001) and MoCA (raw mean difference=-1.22, 95% CI: -2.24 to -0.20, p=0.019). Despite statistical differences in MMSE and MoCA, these results should be interpreted with caution due to methodological heterogeneity. Some studies reported possible neurophysiological benefits induced by exergames, which should be explored in future investigations.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
陶战龙发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
曙光发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
优美芝发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
ding应助韶芸遥采纳,获得10
2秒前
完美世界应助科研之家采纳,获得10
2秒前
小孟发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
钱罐罐发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Ysusb完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
D33sama完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
hhcosy发布了新的文献求助40
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
Shiki完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Megannnb发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
春野发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
lawang发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
lawang发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
张艺凡发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ac发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
在水一方应助Bing采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
乐乐应助合适的飞松采纳,获得10
8秒前
Ysusb发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
momo19完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
852应助兴十一采纳,获得10
9秒前
南北发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
大1完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
Dynamische Polarisation von H-1 und B-11 in (CH-3)-3NBH-3 500
CLSI M07 2024 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7248753
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8871614
关于积分的说明 18719271
捐赠科研通 6928082
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3198540
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2373952
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2173222