Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

医学 眼压 眼科 后弹力膜 视力 荟萃分析 相对风险 角膜 置信区间 内科学
作者
Anna-Karina B. Maier,Jonas Milek,Antonia M. Joussen,Tina Dietrich-Ntoukas,Gregor Lichtner
出处
期刊:American Journal of Ophthalmology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:245: 222-232 被引量:25
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2022.09.013
摘要

To compare the efficacy and safety of ultrathin Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DS(A)EK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the treatment of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) and bullous keratopathy (BK).Systematic review and meta-analysis.Literature containing DMEK and UT-DSAEK were searched in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, and through manual reference searching. Studies were included that measured the outcome of interventions-including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and postoperative complications, especially graft detachment with the need of re-bubbling, graft rejection, graft failure, and postoperative elevated intraocular pressure (IOP)-in patients with FED and BK. Included outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences (SMD) or risk ratios (RR) using random effects models. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and I2 statistic.Seven (of 163) studies met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed a significantly better BCVA 12 months postoperatively, but an increased re-bubbling rate in eyes after DMEK compared with eyes after UT-DS(A)EK (BCVA: SMD = 0.50 [95% CI 0.27-0.74] and re-bubbling rate: RR = 0.33 [95% CI 0.16-0.67]). All other parameters did not differ significantly between both interventions, although estimates were imprecise (graft failure: RR = 0.65 [95% CI 0.18-2.30], graft rejection: RR = 1.40 [95% CI 0.27-7.30], and postoperative intraocular pressure elevation: RR = 1.14 [95% CI 0.60-2.18]). Postoperative SMDs of ECD could not be evaluated due to significant heterogeneity between studies.Although the improvement in BCVA was higher after UT-DS(A)EK than after conventional DS(A)EK, the BCVA after DMEK was still superior. The complication rates were comparable for both procedures, except for the higher rate of re-bubbling after DMEK.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
45发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
万能图书馆应助ki采纳,获得10
刚刚
lxy发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
莹ying完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
乐乐应助崔晓慧采纳,获得10
刚刚
Eric完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
yuni发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
花满城发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
hhhh完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
橙橙发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
孙非发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
淡淡东蒽完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
zhao发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
Hello应助hu采纳,获得30
5秒前
科研通AI6.2应助飒saus采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研通AI6.4应助毛竹采纳,获得10
7秒前
SHIERRY完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
苏_发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
赘婿应助老实映易采纳,获得10
8秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
852应助koi采纳,获得10
10秒前
xing_xing应助悦耳的画板采纳,获得20
10秒前
《子非鱼》完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
斯文的丹秋完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
浪客剑心完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
hihujnvf完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
CodeCraft应助白羽采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
李爱国应助扭扭采纳,获得10
12秒前
今后应助Qin采纳,获得50
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7764575
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9308727
关于积分的说明 20307911
捐赠科研通 7349263
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3314437
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2463919
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2328642