亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Direct oral anticoagulants versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

心房颤动 医学 冲程(发动机) 随机对照试验 拜瑞妥 打开标签 华法林 脑出血 内科学 临床试验 机械工程 蛛网膜下腔出血 工程类
作者
Roland Veltkamp,Eleni Korompoki,Kirsten Harvey,Emily R. Harvey,Cornelia Fießler,Uwe Malzahn,Viktoria Rücker,Joan Montaner,Valeria Caso,Igor Sibon,Peter A. Ringleb,Omid Halse,Klemens Hügen,Sabine Ullmann,Carolin Schuhmann,Gabriele Putz Todd,Kirsten Haas,Elena Palà,Stéphanie Debette,Morgane Lachaize
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00333-2
摘要

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the rate of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation but the benefits and risks in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage are uncertain. We aimed to determine whether DOACs reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke without substantially increasing the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. PRESTIGE-AF is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 75 hospitals in six European countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, an indication for anticoagulation, and a score of 4 or less on the modified Rankin Scale. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to a DOAC or no anticoagulation, stratified by intracerebral haemorrhage location and sex. Only the events adjudication committee was masked to treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were first ischaemic stroke and first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. Hierarchical testing for superiority and non-inferiority, respectively, was performed in the intention-to-treat population. The margin to establish non-inferiority regarding intracerebral haemorrhage was less than 1·735. The safety analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03996772, and is complete. Between May 31, 2019, and Nov 30, 2023, 319 participants were enrolled and 158 were randomly assigned to the DOAC group and 161 to the no anticoagulant group. Patients' median age was 79 years (IQR 73-83). 113 (35%) of 319 patients were female and 206 (65%) were male. Median follow-up was 1·4 years (IQR 0·7-2·3). First ischaemic stroke occurred less frequently in the DOAC group than in the no anticoagulant group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·05 [95% CI 0·01-0·36]; log-rank p<0·0001). The rate of all ischaemic stroke events was 0·83 (95% CI 0·14-2·57) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 8·60 (5·43-12·80) per 100 patient-years in the no anticoagulant group. For first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage, the DOAC group did not meet the prespecified HR for the non-inferiority margin of less than 1·735 (HR 10·89 [90% CI 1·95-60·72]; p=0·96). The event rate of all intracerebral haemorrhage was 5·00 (95% CI 2·68-8·39) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 0·82 (0·14-2·53) per 100 patient years in the no anticoagulant group. Serious adverse events occurred in 70 (44%) of 158 patients in the DOAC group and 89 (55%) of 161 patients in the no anticoagulant group. 16 (10%) patients in the DOAC group and 21 (13%) patients in the no anticoagulant group died. No patients died in the placebo group. DOACs effectively prevent ischaemic strokes in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation but a part of this benefit is offset by a substantially increased risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. To optimise stroke prevention in these vulnerable patients, further evidence from ongoing trials and a meta-analysis of randomised data is needed, as well as the evaluation of safer medical or mechanical alternatives for selected patients. European Commission.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
16秒前
情怀应助去晒月亮采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
cacaldon发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
mmyhn应助de采纳,获得20
4分钟前
4分钟前
cacaldon发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
cacaldon完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
今后应助Chemmer采纳,获得10
4分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
5分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
mama完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
CherylZhao完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
7分钟前
岁和景明完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3976675
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3520770
关于积分的说明 11204814
捐赠科研通 3257528
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798733
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877897
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806629