Direct oral anticoagulants versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

心房颤动 医学 冲程(发动机) 随机对照试验 拜瑞妥 打开标签 华法林 脑出血 内科学 临床试验 机械工程 工程类 蛛网膜下腔出血
作者
Roland Veltkamp,Eleni Korompoki,Kirsten Harvey,Emily R. Harvey,Cornelia Fießler,Uwe Malzahn,Viktoria Rücker,Joan Montaner,Valeria Caso,Igor Sibon,Peter A. Ringleb,Omid Halse,Klemens Hügen,Sabine Ullmann,Carolin Schuhmann,Gabriele Putz Todd,Kirsten Haas,Elena Palà,Stéphanie Debette,Morgane Lachaize
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:405 (10482): 927-936 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00333-2
摘要

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the rate of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation but the benefits and risks in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage are uncertain. We aimed to determine whether DOACs reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke without substantially increasing the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. METHODS: PRESTIGE-AF is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 75 hospitals in six European countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, an indication for anticoagulation, and a score of 4 or less on the modified Rankin Scale. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to a DOAC or no anticoagulation, stratified by intracerebral haemorrhage location and sex. Only the events adjudication committee was masked to treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were first ischaemic stroke and first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. Hierarchical testing for superiority and non-inferiority, respectively, was performed in the intention-to-treat population. The margin to establish non-inferiority regarding intracerebral haemorrhage was less than 1·735. The safety analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03996772, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between May 31, 2019, and Nov 30, 2023, 319 participants were enrolled and 158 were randomly assigned to the DOAC group and 161 to the no anticoagulant group. Patients' median age was 79 years (IQR 73-83). 113 (35%) of 319 patients were female and 206 (65%) were male. Median follow-up was 1·4 years (IQR 0·7-2·3). First ischaemic stroke occurred less frequently in the DOAC group than in the no anticoagulant group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·05 [95% CI 0·01-0·36]; log-rank p<0·0001). The rate of all ischaemic stroke events was 0·83 (95% CI 0·14-2·57) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 8·60 (5·43-12·80) per 100 patient-years in the no anticoagulant group. For first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage, the DOAC group did not meet the prespecified HR for the non-inferiority margin of less than 1·735 (HR 10·89 [90% CI 1·95-60·72]; p=0·96). The event rate of all intracerebral haemorrhage was 5·00 (95% CI 2·68-8·39) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 0·82 (0·14-2·53) per 100 patient years in the no anticoagulant group. Serious adverse events occurred in 70 (44%) of 158 patients in the DOAC group and 89 (55%) of 161 patients in the no anticoagulant group. 16 (10%) patients in the DOAC group and 21 (13%) patients in the no anticoagulant group died. INTERPRETATION: DOACs effectively prevent ischaemic strokes in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation but a part of this benefit is offset by a substantially increased risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. To optimise stroke prevention in these vulnerable patients, further evidence from ongoing trials and a meta-analysis of randomised data is needed, as well as the evaluation of safer medical or mechanical alternatives for selected patients. FUNDING: European Commission.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
欣欣发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
jiaping发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
梓越发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
多喝水发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
yuanyuan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
屈屈完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
乘凉完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
传统的故事应助日新又新采纳,获得10
2秒前
偷书贼完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
太兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
jcksonzhj完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
小冉发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
桐桐应助熊涛采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
彭于晏应助SaintLee采纳,获得10
4秒前
小马甲应助ly采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
bgxb发布了新的文献求助50
4秒前
搜集达人应助爱笑的笑蓝采纳,获得10
4秒前
zhuanghao完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
光亮发卡发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
帅帅的叔发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
思源应助青屿采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
乐乐应助xx采纳,获得10
6秒前
儒雅的凝旋完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7255412
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8877482
关于积分的说明 18747034
捐赠科研通 6935778
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3200374
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2374907
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2175592