已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Direct oral anticoagulants versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

心房颤动 医学 冲程(发动机) 随机对照试验 拜瑞妥 打开标签 华法林 脑出血 内科学 临床试验 机械工程 蛛网膜下腔出血 工程类
作者
Roland Veltkamp,Eleni Korompoki,Kirsten Harvey,Emily R. Harvey,Cornelia Fießler,Uwe Malzahn,Viktoria Rücker,Joan Montaner,Valeria Caso,Igor Sibon,Peter A. Ringleb,Omid Halse,Klemens Hügen,Sabine Ullmann,Carolin Schuhmann,Gabriele Putz Todd,Kirsten Haas,Elena Palà,Stéphanie Debette,Morgane Lachaize
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:405 (10482): 927-936 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00333-2
摘要

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the rate of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation but the benefits and risks in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage are uncertain. We aimed to determine whether DOACs reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke without substantially increasing the risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. Methods: PRESTIGE-AF is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 75 hospitals in six European countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, an indication for anticoagulation, and a score of 4 or less on the modified Rankin Scale. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to a DOAC or no anticoagulation, stratified by intracerebral haemorrhage location and sex. Only the events adjudication committee was masked to treatment allocation. The coprimary endpoints were first ischaemic stroke and first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. Hierarchical testing for superiority and non-inferiority, respectively, was performed in the intention-to-treat population. The margin to establish non-inferiority regarding intracerebral haemorrhage was less than 1·735. The safety analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03996772, and is complete. Findings: Between May 31, 2019, and Nov 30, 2023, 319 participants were enrolled and 158 were randomly assigned to the DOAC group and 161 to the no anticoagulant group. Patients' median age was 79 years (IQR 73–83). 113 (35%) of 319 patients were female and 206 (65%) were male. Median follow-up was 1·4 years (IQR 0·7–2·3). First ischaemic stroke occurred less frequently in the DOAC group than in the no anticoagulant group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·05 [95% CI 0·01–0·36]; log-rank p<0·0001). The rate of all ischaemic stroke events was 0·83 (95% CI 0·14–2·57) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 8·60 (5·43–12·80) per 100 patient-years in the no anticoagulant group. For first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage, the DOAC group did not meet the prespecified HR for the non-inferiority margin of less than 1·735 (HR 10·89 [90% CI 1·95–60·72]; p=0·96). The event rate of all intracerebral haemorrhage was 5·00 (95% CI 2·68–8·39) per 100 patient-years in the DOAC group versus 0·82 (0·14–2·53) per 100 patient years in the no anticoagulant group. Serious adverse events occurred in 70 (44%) of 158 patients in the DOAC group and 89 (55%) of 161 patients in the no anticoagulant group. 16 (10%) patients in the DOAC group and 21 (13%) patients in the no anticoagulant group died. Interpretation: DOACs effectively prevent ischaemic strokes in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation but a part of this benefit is offset by a substantially increased risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage. To optimise stroke prevention in these vulnerable patients, further evidence from ongoing trials and a meta-analysis of randomised data is needed, as well as the evaluation of safer medical or mechanical alternatives for selected patients. Funding: European Commission.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Coivis发布了新的文献求助50
1秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助雨眠采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6应助潇洒采纳,获得30
4秒前
6秒前
6秒前
chali48完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
T_MC郭发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
隐形初雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
稳重的友灵完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
15秒前
郭翃宇发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
syiimo完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
向北游发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
临澈完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
科研通AI6应助Condor采纳,获得10
21秒前
Grace发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
晁子枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
milly发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
雅馨芬芳发布了新的文献求助20
25秒前
科研通AI5应助腼腆钵钵鸡采纳,获得10
25秒前
28秒前
淡淡十三发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Jasper应助威海大雪采纳,获得10
29秒前
蓝风铃完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
叶xr发布了新的文献求助30
30秒前
wanci应助蜒栩柚子采纳,获得10
31秒前
31秒前
Zhang完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
情怀应助cwwqt采纳,获得10
33秒前
深情安青应助调皮帆布鞋采纳,获得10
33秒前
orixero应助anyig采纳,获得10
34秒前
淡淡书双发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
水蜜桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
雅馨芬芳完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
36秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Voyage au bout de la révolution: de Pékin à Sochaux 700
ICDD求助cif文件 500
First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, 2nd Edition 500
Assessment of adverse effects of Alzheimer's disease medications: Analysis of notifications to Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers in Northwest France 400
The Secrets of Successful Product Launches 300
The Rise & Fall of Classical Legal Thought 260
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4340929
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3849236
关于积分的说明 12019688
捐赠科研通 3490495
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1915606
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 958665
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 858722