中止
视觉障碍
伏立康唑
不利影响
槽浓度
扰动(地质)
幻觉
化学
麻醉
医学
内科学
外科
药代动力学
皮肤病科
听力学
抗真菌
古生物学
生物
作者
Hideo Kato,Mao Hagihara,Yukihiro Hamada,Yusuke Koizumi,Naoya Nishiyama,Yuka Yamagishi,Katsuhiko Matsuura,Hiroshige Mikamo
出处
期刊:PubMed
[National Institutes of Health]
日期:2016-09-01
卷期号:69 (3): 143-150
被引量:13
摘要
Visual disturbance or central symptom like hallucination is well known to be one of the common drug adverse events in response to voriconazole (VRCZ). We observed 123 patients treated VRCZ from April 2012 to January 2016. Two of these cases experienced visual disturbance and 4 of these cases experienced central symptom. Six patients appeared visual disturbance or central symptom within 1 week after administration of VRCZ (visual disturbance; 3 days [2-42 days], central symptom; 6 days [3-9 days]) and disappeared visual disturbance or central symptom at an early date after discontinuation of administration or decreasing dose of VRCZ. The trough concentration of VRCZ in patients who experienced central symptom was similar with that in-patients who did not experience adverse events by VRCZ (case 3; 3.79μg/ mL, case 4; 1.28μg/mL vs 3.73μg/mL [0.09-13.27 μg/mL]). On the other hand, the trough concentration of VRCZ in patients who experienced visual disturbance was higher than that in patients who did not experience adverse events by VRCZ (case 5; 7.49μg/mL, case 6; 4.45μg/ mL vs 3.73μg/mL [0.09-13.27μg/mL]). In conclusion, we thought that the risk factor of visual disturbance was the increasing concentration of VRCZ. Therefore, we should monitor the onset of visual disturbance or central symptom in patients treated with VRCZ, especially central symptom that the concentration is unconcerned.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI