Benefits and Harms of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Chronic Painful Conditions, Depression, Anxiety, and Insomnia

焦虑 医学 随机对照试验 纤维肌痛 萧条(经济学) 物理疗法 失眠症 临床试验 慢性疼痛 安慰剂 精神科 内科学 替代医学 宏观经济学 病理 经济
作者
Paul G Shekelle,Ian A. Cook,Isomi M Miake-Lye,Marika Booth,Jessica M Beroes,Selene Mak
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:168 (6): 414-421 被引量:69
标识
DOI:10.7326/m17-1970
摘要

Background: Cranial electrical stimulation (CES) is increasingly popular as a treatment, yet its clinical benefit is unclear. Purpose: To review evidence about the benefits and harms of CES for adult patients with chronic painful conditions, depression, anxiety, and insomnia. Data Sources: Several databases from inception to 10 October 2017 without language restrictions and references from experts, prior reviews, and manufacturers. Study Selection: Randomized controlled trials of CES versus usual care or sham CES that reported pain, depression, anxiety, or sleep outcomes in any language. Data Extraction: Single-reviewer extraction checked by another; dual independent quality assessment; strength-of-evidence grading by the first author with subsequent group discussion. Data Synthesis: Twenty-eight articles from 26 randomized trials met eligibility criteria. The 2 trials that compared CES with usual care were small, and neither reported a statistically significant benefit in pain or anxiety outcomes for patients with fibromyalgia or anxiety, respectively. Fourteen trials with sham or placebo controls involving patients with painful conditions, such as headache, neuromuscular pain, or musculoskeletal pain, had conflicting results. Four trials done more than 40 years ago and 1 from 2014 provided low-strength evidence of a possible modest benefit compared with sham treatments in patients with anxiety and depression. Trials in patients with insomnia (n = 2), insomnia and anxiety (n = 1), or depression (n = 3) had inconclusive or conflicting results. Low-strength evidence suggested that CES does not cause serious side effects. Limitation: Most trials had small sample sizes and short durations; all had high risk of bias due to inadequate blinding. Conclusion: Evidence is insufficient that CES has clinically important effects on fibromyalgia, headache, neuromusculoskeletal pain, degenerative joint pain, depression, or insomnia; low-strength evidence suggests modest benefit in patients with anxiety and depression. Primary Funding Source: Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. (PROSPERO: CRD42016023951).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
馆长应助TheSen采纳,获得50
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
wg发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
朴实初兰发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
5秒前
qianlan发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小鱼爱吃肉应助ilmiss采纳,获得10
5秒前
CLRGGYL发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
识时务这也完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
马达加斯加的企鹅完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
hutao发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
绾绾完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
在水一方应助大帅采纳,获得10
10秒前
Akim应助lyf采纳,获得10
11秒前
852应助Haha采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
coollz发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
hhh发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
wang完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
温柔的兔子完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
Melt完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
15秒前
pp完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
bkagyin应助coollz采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
科研通AI6.2应助maolihui采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
摆烂完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
A Study of the Model by which Principals’ Leadership Behaviour Influences Student Learning Outcomes in Elementary Schools 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
核安全综合知识2024版 500
Photothermal Science and Techniques 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7709557
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9266560
关于积分的说明 20060954
捐赠科研通 7285807
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3296724
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2451316
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2303671