医学
内科学
免疫疗法
肿瘤科
靶向治疗
危险系数
肝细胞癌
不利影响
优势比
置信区间
荟萃分析
随机对照试验
临床试验
实体瘤疗效评价标准
临床研究阶段
全身疗法
临床终点
总体生存率
联合疗法
放射治疗
治疗效果
无进展生存期
外科
完全响应
存活率
作者
Lichao Wang,Bo Luo,Mingrui Zhao,Jin-Hai Shen
标识
DOI:10.1177/17562848251396424
摘要
Background: The current standard treatment paradigm for patients with unresectable and non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involves transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as the primary local therapeutic modality, followed by systemic therapy upon disease progression. Emerging evidence suggests that the concurrent integration of immunotherapy and targeted therapy with TACE may yield synergistic therapeutic effects. Recent phase III trials—including EMERALD-1, LEAP-012, and TALENTACE—have provided important insights into the efficacy and safety of this multimodal approach. Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively synthesize the efficacy and safety of first-line TACE combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy versus TACE alone in patients with unresectable, non-metastatic HCC. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data sources and methods: A systematic search of PubMed and major conference proceedings was conducted up to July 6, 2025. Three phase III trials (EMERALD-1, LEAP-012, TALENTACE) were included. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS), odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR), and risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events (AEs) were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effects models. Results: The combination of TACE with immunotherapy and targeted therapy demonstrated superior efficacy compared to TACE monotherapy. The pooled HR for PFS was 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60–0.79), indicating a significant delay in disease progression. The pooled OR for ORR was 1.83 (95% CI: 1.45–2.31), reflecting a markedly improved tumor response rate. However, overall survival (OS) data remain immature, and no statistically significant difference in OS was observed at this stage. In terms of safety, the combination therapy was associated with a higher incidence of AEs. Specifically, it significantly increased the risk of grade 3–5 AEs (RR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.48–2.40) and serious AEs (RR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.31–2.07). Conclusion: First-line treatment with TACE combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy significantly improves tumor response and prolongs PFS in patients with unresectable and non-metastatic HCC, albeit at the cost of increased toxicity. This combination strategy represents a promising advancement in the therapeutic landscape for HCC, offering meaningful improvements in oncologic outcomes while highlighting the need for careful toxicity management. Trial registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD420250652613).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI