A semi‐monolithic detector providing intrinsic DOI‐encoding and sub‐200 ps CRT TOF‐capabilities for clinical PET applications

BACKGROUND: Current clinical positron emission tomography (PET) systems utilize detectors where the scintillator typically contains single elements of 3-6-mm width and about 20-mm height. While providing good time-of-flight performance, this design limits the spatial resolution and causes radial astigmatism as the depth-of-interaction (DOI) remains unknown. PURPOSE: We propose an alternative, aiming to combine the advantages of current detectors with the DOI capabilities shown for monolithic concepts, based on semi-monolithic scintillators (slabs). Here, the optical photons spread along one dimension enabling DOI-encoding with a still small readout area beneficial for timing performance. METHODS: was read out by a 64-channel photosensor containing digital SiPMs (DPC3200-22-44, Philips Digital Photon Counting). The position estimation in the detector's monolithic and DOI direction was based on a calibration with a fan beam collimator and the machine learning technique gradient tree boosting (GTB). RESULTS: We achieved a positioning performance in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.44 mm for the monolithic direction and 2.12 mm for DOI considering a wide energy window of 300-700 keV. The energy resolution was determined to be 11.3%, applying a positional-dependent energy calibration. We established both an analytical and machine-learning-based timing calibration approach and applied them for a first-photon trigger. The analytical timing calibration corrects for electronic and optical time skews leading to 240 ps coincidence resolving time (CRT) for a pair of slab-detectors. The CRT was significantly improved by utilizing GTB to predict the time difference based on specific training data and applied on top of the analytical calibration. We achieved 209 ps for the wide energy window and 198 ps for a narrow selection around the photopeak (411-561 keV). To maintain the detector's sensitivity, no filters were applied to the data during processing. CONCLUSION: Overall, the semi-monolithic detector provides attractive performance characteristics. Especially, a good CRT can be achieved while introducing DOI capabilities to the detector, making the concept suitable for clinical PET scanners.