弗洛斯
化学
色谱法
固相微萃取
质谱法
离子迁移光谱法
气相色谱法
气相色谱-质谱法
挥发性有机化合物
有机化学
芦丁
抗氧化剂
作者
Tong Wu,Jiaxin Yin,Xinlong Wu,Wei Li,Songtao Bie,Jing Zhao,Xinbo Song,Heshui Yu,Zheng Li
摘要
Rationale The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of Lonicerae Japonicae flos (LJF) and Lonicera flos (LF) play a pivotal role in determining their sensory characteristics, medicinal properties, and subsequent impact on market pricing and consumer preferences. However, the differences and specificity of these VOCs remain obscure. Hence, it is crucial to conduct a comprehensive characterization of the VOCs in LJF and LF and pinpoint their potential differential VOCs. Methods In this study, headspace gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry (HS‐GC/IMS) and headspace solid‐phase microextraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS‐SPME‐GC/MS) were employed to comprehensively investigate the compositional characteristics and distinctions in VOCs between LJF and LF. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to identify candidate differential VOCs of LJF and LF samples. Results A total of 54 and 88 VOCs were identified using HS‐GC/IMS and HS‐SPME‐GC/MS analysis, respectively. Primary VOCs detected in LJF include leaf alcohol, ( E )‐2‐hexen‐1‐ol dimer, 2‐octyn‐1‐ol, and ( E )‐3‐hexen‐1‐ol. Key VOCs prevalent in LF encompass farnesol, heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, and valeric acid. Multivariate statistical analysis indicates that compounds such as phenethyl alcohol and leaf alcohol were selected as potential VOCs for distinguishing between LJF and LF. Conclusion This research conducted a comprehensive analysis of the fundamental volatile components in both LJF and LF. It subsequently elucidated the distinctions and specificities within their respective VOC profiles. And this study enables differentiation between LJF and LF through the analysis of VOCs, offering valuable insights for enhancing the quality control of both LJF and LF.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI