Clinical and economic impact of oxidized regenerated cellulose for surgeries in a Chinese tertiary care hospital

Aim: To assess the impact of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) on blood transfusion and hospital costs associated with surgeries. Patients & methods: This retrospective cohort study selected ten surgeries to create propensity-score matching groups to compare ORC versus nonORC (conventional hemostatic techniques such as manual pressure, ligature and electrocautery). Results: NonORC was associated with both higher blood transfusion volume and higher hospital costs than ORC in endoscopic transnasal sphenoidal surgery, nonskull base craniotomy, hepatectomy, cholangiotomy, gastrectomy and lumbar surgery. However, nonORC was associated with better outcomes than ORC in open colorectal surgery, mammectomy and hip arthroplasty surgery. Conclusion: When compared with conventional hemostatic technique, using ORC could impact blood transfusion and hospital costs differently by surgical settings.