任务(项目管理)
认知
任务分析
工作(物理)
工作分析
透视图(图形)
计算机科学
期限(时间)
认知心理学
认知工效学
协议分析
心理学
认知科学
人工智能
社会心理学
工程类
人为因素与人体工程学
毒物控制
系统工程
神经科学
物理
环境卫生
机械工程
医学
量子力学
工作满意度
标识
DOI:10.1177/154193129503900921
摘要
The term cognitive task analysis (CTA) has been appearing in the human factors literature with increasing frequency. Others have used the term cognitive work analysis (CWA). Is there a difference? Do either of these methods differ from traditional task analysis (TA)? If so, what advantages can CTA/CWA provide human factors engineers? To address these issues, the history of work analysis methods and the evolution of work are reviewed. Work method analyses of the 19th century were suited to manual labor. As job demands progressed beyond the physical, traditional TA was introduced to provide a broader perspective. CTA has since been introduced to increase the emphasis on cognitive task demands. However, CTA, like TA, is incapable of dealing with unanticipated task demands. CWA has been introduced to deal with complex systems whose demands include unanticipated events. The initial evidence available indicates that CWA can be applied to industry-scale problems, leading to innovative designs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI