锰
鸟粪石
渗滤液
碳酸盐
无机化学
残留物(化学)
化学
氨
氮气
降水
环境化学
环境科学
镁
有机化学
气象学
生物化学
物理
作者
Jiancheng Shu,Haiping Wu,Mengjun Chen,Hao Peng,Bing Li,Renlong Liu,Zuohua Liu,Bin Wang,Teng Huang,Zhibo Hu
出处
期刊:Water Research
[Elsevier]
日期:2018-12-27
卷期号:153: 229-238
被引量:190
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.044
摘要
Abstract A comparative investigation of hydroxide precipitation, sulfide precipitation, carbonate precipitation and the struvite formation process for removing manganese and ammonia nitrogen from electrolytic metal manganese residue leachate (EMMRL) was investigated. Chemical equilibrium model-Visual MINTEQ was applied to simulate the chemical reactions and optimize chemical dosages in manganese and ammonia nitrogen removal. Phase transition, morphology, and valence state of the precipitates were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). Results indicated that carbonate precipitation prior to the other two methods for removal of manganese and ammonia nitrogen. The removal efficiency of manganese was 99.9%, when molar ratio of C to Mn was 1.1:1 at pH 9.5, and manganese was removed in the form of MnCO3. When molar ratio of P to N was 1.1:1 at pH 9.5, the removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen was 97.4%, and ammonia nitrogen was removed in the form of struvite. Economic evaluation reveals that the treatment cost was 9.316 $ m−3 when carbonate and phosphate was used to remove manganese and ammonia nitrogen from EMMRL.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI