The neural basis of pain during labor

Characterizing a labor pain–related neural signature is a key prerequisite for devising optimized pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic labor pain relief methods. The aim of this study was to describe the neural basis of labor pain and to provide a brief summary of how epidural anesthesia may affect pain–related neuronal activity during labor. Possible future directions are also highlighted. By taking advantage of functional magnetic resonance imaging, brain activation maps and functional neural networks of women during labor that have been recently characterized were compared between pregnant women who received epidural anesthesia and those who did not. In the subgroup of women who did not receive epidural anesthesia, labor–related pain elicited activations in a distributed brain network that included regions within the primary somatosensory cortex (postcentral gyrus and left parietal operculum cortex) and within the traditional pain network (lentiform nucleus, insula, and anterior cingulate gyrus). The activation maps of women who had been administered epidural anesthesia were found to be different—especially with respect to the postcentral gyrus, the insula, and the anterior cingulate gyrus. Parturients who received epidural anesthesia were also compared with those who did not in terms of functional connectivity from selected sensory and affective regions. When analyzing women who did not receive epidural anesthesia, marked bilateral connections from the postcentral gyrus to the superior parietal lobule, supplementary motor area, precentral gyrus, and the right anterior supramarginal gyrus were observed. In contrast, women who received epidural anesthesia showed fewer connections from the postcentral gyrus—being limited to the superior parietal lobule and supplementary motor area. Importantly, one of the most noticeable effects of epidural anesthesia was observed in the anterior cingulate cortex—a primary region that modulates pain perception. The increased outgoing connectivity from the anterior cingulate cortex in women who received epidural anesthesia indicates that the cognitive control exerted by this area might play a major role in the relief from labor pain. These findings not only affirmed the existence of a brain signature for pain experienced during labor, but they also showed that this signature can be altered by the administration of epidural anesthesia. This finding raises a question about the extent to which the cingulo-frontal cortex may exert top-down influences to gate women's experiences of labor-related pain. Because the anterior cingulate cortex is also involved in the processing and modulation of emotional content, such as fear and anxiety, a related question is about the extent to which the use of epidural anesthesia can affect different components of pain perception. Finally, inhibition of anterior cingulate cortex neurons may represent a potential new therapeutic target for alleviating labor-associated pain. Characterizing a labor pain–related neural signature is a key prerequisite for devising optimized pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic labor pain relief methods. The aim of this study was to describe the neural basis of labor pain and to provide a brief summary of how epidural anesthesia may affect pain–related neuronal activity during labor. Possible future directions are also highlighted. By taking advantage of functional magnetic resonance imaging, brain activation maps and functional neural networks of women during labor that have been recently characterized were compared between pregnant women who received epidural anesthesia and those who did not. In the subgroup of women who did not receive epidural anesthesia, labor–related pain elicited activations in a distributed brain network that included regions within the primary somatosensory cortex (postcentral gyrus and left parietal operculum cortex) and within the traditional pain network (lentiform nucleus, insula, and anterior cingulate gyrus). The activation maps of women who had been administered epidural anesthesia were found to be different—especially with respect to the postcentral gyrus, the insula, and the anterior cingulate gyrus. Parturients who received epidural anesthesia were also compared with those who did not in terms of functional connectivity from selected sensory and affective regions. When analyzing women who did not receive epidural anesthesia, marked bilateral connections from the postcentral gyrus to the superior parietal lobule, supplementary motor area, precentral gyrus, and the right anterior supramarginal gyrus were observed. In contrast, women who received epidural anesthesia showed fewer connections from the postcentral gyrus—being limited to the superior parietal lobule and supplementary motor area. Importantly, one of the most noticeable effects of epidural anesthesia was observed in the anterior cingulate cortex—a primary region that modulates pain perception. The increased outgoing connectivity from the anterior cingulate cortex in women who received epidural anesthesia indicates that the cognitive control exerted by this area might play a major role in the relief from labor pain. These findings not only affirmed the existence of a brain signature for pain experienced during labor, but they also showed that this signature can be altered by the administration of epidural anesthesia. This finding raises a question about the extent to which the cingulo-frontal cortex may exert top-down influences to gate women's experiences of labor-related pain. Because the anterior cingulate cortex is also involved in the processing and modulation of emotional content, such as fear and anxiety, a related question is about the extent to which the use of epidural anesthesia can affect different components of pain perception. Finally, inhibition of anterior cingulate cortex neurons may represent a potential new therapeutic target for alleviating labor-associated pain.