有用性
赞扬
终结性评价
指令
心理学
教育学
形成性评价
数学教育
社会心理学
计算机科学
程序设计语言
作者
Kwangsu Cho,Christian D. Schunn,Davida Charney
标识
DOI:10.1177/0741088306289261
摘要
How do comments on student writing from peers compare to those from subject-matter experts? This study examined the types of comments that reviewers produce as well as their perceived helpfulness. Comments on classmates’ papers were collected from two undergraduate and one graduate-level psychology course. The undergraduate papers in one of the courses were also commented on by an independent psychology instructor experienced in providing feedback to students on similar writing tasks. The comments produced by students at both levels were shorter than the instructor’s. The instructor’s comments were predominantly directive and rarely summative. The undergraduate peers’ comments were more mixed in type; directive and praise comments were the most frequent. Consistently, undergraduate peers found directive and praise comments helpful. The helpfulness of the directive comments was also endorsed by a writing expert.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI