亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

What are Delphi studies?

德尔菲法 德尔菲 专家意见 集合(抽象数据类型) 领域(数学) 甲骨文公司 匿名 计算机科学 管理科学 知识管理 数据科学 心理学 工程伦理学 工程类 人工智能 医学 数学 软件工程 重症监护医学 操作系统 程序设计语言 纯数学 计算机安全
作者
David Barrett,Roberta Heale
出处
期刊:Evidence-Based Nursing [BMJ]
卷期号:23 (3): 68-69 被引量:346
标识
DOI:10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103303
摘要

Whenever developing training competencies, tools to support clinical practice or a response to a professional issue, seeking the opinion of experts is a common approach. By working to identify a consensus position, researchers can report findings on a specific question (or set of questions) that are based on the knowledge and experience of experts in their field. However, there are challenges to this approach. For example, what should be done when consensus cannot be reached? How can experts be engaged in a way that allows them to consider objectively the views of others and—where appropriate—change their own opinions in response? One approach that attempts to provide a clear method for gathering expert opinion is the Delphi technique . The Delphi technique was first developed in the 1950s by Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer in an attempt to gain reliable expert consensus. Specifically, they developed an approach—named after the Ancient Greek Oracle of Delphi , who could predict the future—which promoted anonymity and avoided direct confrontation between experts, so that the methods employed “…appear to be more conducive to independent thought on the part of the experts and to aid them in the gradual formation of a considered opinion ”.1 Though the original Delphi study was linked to the defence industry, the technique has spread to other research areas, including nursing.2 As with all research methods, the Delphi technique has evolved since it was first reported on in the 1960s. However, many of the fundamental characteristics of the approach still remain from Dalkey and Helmer’s original outline. First, the overarching approach is based on a …
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
在水一方应助坦率的邑采纳,获得10
刚刚
文艺冰露发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
8秒前
坦率的邑发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
科研通AI6.4应助文艺冰露采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研通AI2S应助坦率的邑采纳,获得10
21秒前
总是很简单完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
30秒前
搜集达人应助ywl采纳,获得10
34秒前
水若琳发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
好友新娘完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
45秒前
Ava应助江蹇采纳,获得10
50秒前
aaa发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
52秒前
53秒前
直率的笑翠完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
ywl发布了新的文献求助10
56秒前
Lan完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
linglingling完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
江蹇发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
江蹇完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
科研通AI6.2应助1a采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
ding应助安详的面包采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.1应助MutantKitten采纳,获得10
1分钟前
5555完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
李忆梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
胺碘酮完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1a发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Software that combines deep learning,3D reconstruction and CFD to analyze the state of carotid arteries from ultrasound imaging 500
Bounds for Statistical Estimation in Semiparametric Models 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6495759
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8292535
关于积分的说明 17694822
捐赠科研通 5589863
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2916654
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1893537
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1753057