What are Delphi studies?

德尔菲法 德尔菲 专家意见 集合(抽象数据类型) 领域(数学) 甲骨文公司 匿名 计算机科学 管理科学 知识管理 数据科学 心理学 工程伦理学 工程类 人工智能 医学 数学 软件工程 计算机安全 重症监护医学 纯数学 程序设计语言 操作系统
作者
David Barrett,Roberta Heale
出处
期刊:Evidence-Based Nursing [BMJ]
卷期号:23 (3): 68-69 被引量:346
标识
DOI:10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103303
摘要

Whenever developing training competencies, tools to support clinical practice or a response to a professional issue, seeking the opinion of experts is a common approach. By working to identify a consensus position, researchers can report findings on a specific question (or set of questions) that are based on the knowledge and experience of experts in their field. However, there are challenges to this approach. For example, what should be done when consensus cannot be reached? How can experts be engaged in a way that allows them to consider objectively the views of others and—where appropriate—change their own opinions in response? One approach that attempts to provide a clear method for gathering expert opinion is the Delphi technique . The Delphi technique was first developed in the 1950s by Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer in an attempt to gain reliable expert consensus. Specifically, they developed an approach—named after the Ancient Greek Oracle of Delphi , who could predict the future—which promoted anonymity and avoided direct confrontation between experts, so that the methods employed “…appear to be more conducive to independent thought on the part of the experts and to aid them in the gradual formation of a considered opinion ”.1 Though the original Delphi study was linked to the defence industry, the technique has spread to other research areas, including nursing.2 As with all research methods, the Delphi technique has evolved since it was first reported on in the 1960s. However, many of the fundamental characteristics of the approach still remain from Dalkey and Helmer’s original outline. First, the overarching approach is based on a …
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
觏尔应助富贵采纳,获得10
1秒前
liulei发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
九月完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zhishi完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
SAY发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
小蘑菇应助锥形瓶采纳,获得10
2秒前
李健应助入夏采纳,获得10
2秒前
chenshiyi185完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
核桃应助蛋挞好好吃采纳,获得10
3秒前
悠明夜月完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
小学渣完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
生动沅完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
健壮的芷容完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
华老五完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Ekko完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小王完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
前蹄儿完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Superman完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
刘彤完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
YH发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
蟹黄包包完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
吕jdjshs完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
CodeCraft应助曾经念真采纳,获得10
8秒前
小马甲应助曾经念真采纳,获得10
8秒前
SYX完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助默默的巧蕊采纳,获得10
9秒前
huoyunli发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
april完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
泽牧完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
减肥为窈窕完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, 2nd Edition 500
Assessment of adverse effects of Alzheimer's disease medications: Analysis of notifications to Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers in Northwest France 400
The Secrets of Successful Product Launches 300
The Rise & Fall of Classical Legal Thought 260
Encyclopedia of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment Volume 1: Sustainable Development and Bioenergy Solutions 200
Zentrumsmannigfaltigkeiten für quasilineare parabolische Gleichungen 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4346036
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3852487
关于积分的说明 12024840
捐赠科研通 3493998
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1917202
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 960187
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 860172