计算机科学
聚类分析
集合预报
集成学习
构象集合
蛋白质结构预测
人工智能
机器学习
蒙特卡罗方法
蛋白质结构
深度学习
模式识别(心理学)
多种型号
集合(抽象数据类型)
数据挖掘
星团(航天器)
序列(生物学)
系综平均
分子动力学
统计系综
结构线形
鉴定(生物学)
结构相似性
作者
Qiqige Wuyun,Quancheng Liu,Weiyi Ni,Chunxiang Peng,Ziying Zhang,Xiaogen Zhou,Gang Hu,Lydia Freddolino,Wei Zheng
出处
期刊:Proteins
[Wiley]
日期:2025-09-27
卷期号:94 (1): 348-361
摘要
We report the results from the "MIEnsembles-Server" and "Zheng" groups for structure ensemble predictions in CASP16, both of which employed the EnsembleFold pipeline. Initially, multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) were generated using DeepMSA2 for proteins and rMSA for RNA targets. These MSAs were processed by newly developed deep learning methods-D-I-TASSER2 for protein monomer structure prediction, DMFold2 for protein complex structure prediction, ExFold for RNA structure prediction, and DeepProtNA for protein-nucleic acid complex structure prediction-to yield diverse structural decoys. The generated decoys were clustered into representative models corresponding to distinct conformational states using the structural clustering tool MolClust. Protein monomer targets underwent additional refinement via replica-exchange Monte Carlo (REMC) simulations with D-I-TASSER2, and these refined decoys were re-clustered with MolClust to finalize the ensemble predictions. For the 19 ensemble targets in CASP16, the final EnsembleFold models achieved an average TM-score of 0.657, representing improvements of 10.2% compared to the baseline AlphaFold3 program. Notably, EnsembleFold achieved particularly good performance for hybrid protein/nucleic-acid targets, leading to its efficacy in ensemble prediction tasks. Analysis of the resulting structural ensembles highlighted three significant insights: (i) Models derived from distinct DeepMSA2-generated MSAs typically represent different conformational states for ensemble targets; (ii) REMC simulations significantly enhance model diversity, facilitating the identification of alternative conformations; (iii) The structural clustering approach effectively identifies and selects accurate representative models for each conformational state. We further discuss potential improvements in Quality Assessment (QA) scoring methods that could further enhance the reliability and accuracy of ensemble predictions in the future.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI