最高法院
法理学
司法意见
种族(生物学)
社会学
质量(理念)
法学
政治学
公共关系
性别研究
哲学
认识论
作者
Julie Margetta Morgan,Diana Pullin
标识
DOI:10.3102/0013189x10383334
摘要
Social scientists collect vital information that bears on issues of education policy. When the courts are faced with an opportunity to make a decision that shapes education, judges need access to high-quality research, but they must also be convinced that it can be useful in their decision making. This article approaches the question of how social science can be made more effective in judicial decision making. The authors examine the use of social science evidence by the courts and the theories of jurisprudence that bear on its effectiveness. As an example of the difficulty of influencing the outcome of a case, they review the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision involving the use of race in school assignments in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI