Patients' description of rectal effluent and quality of bowel preparation at colonoscopy

医学 结肠镜检查 肠道准备 流出物 质量(理念) 普通外科 胃肠病学 内科学 结直肠癌 环境科学 癌症 环境工程 哲学 认识论
作者
Hala Fatima,Cynthia S. Johnson,Douglas K. Rex
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:71 (7): 1244-1252.e2 被引量:63
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.053
摘要

Background There are few data evaluating how accurately patients can predict the quality of their colonoscopy preparation. Objective The aim of this study was to assess whether patients' description of rectal effluent predicts preparation quality as assessed per endoscopist. Design Prospective, cross-sectional. Setting Three outpatient endoscopy units at Indiana University Medical Center. Patients Patients undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled. Interventions Patients were given a questionnaire assessing their preparation based on the description of their last rectal effluent. This was compared with endoscopists assessment of preparation. Main outcome measurements Correlation between the patient's description of the last effluent and endoscopist's assessment of preparation. Results Of the total 429 patients, 59% were male and 75% were white. There was only slight agreement between the patients' description of effluent and the endoscopists' description of preparation (Cohen kappa statistic, 0.067). However, patients reporting brown liquid or solid had a 54% chance of having fair or poor preparation. Ingestion of Limitations No validated system to assess the quality of the bowel preparation or for patients to assess their preparation. Conclusion Patients' description of last rectal effluent is not a reliable predictor of quality of preparation per the endoscopist, but patients reporting their last effluent as brown liquid or solid have a substantial likelihood of inadequate preparation. These patients may benefit from additional preparation, which may be particularly useful if it can be administered in the endoscopy unit followed by colonoscopy on the same day.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
雷豪发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被pikachu采纳,获得10
2秒前
limh完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
虾球完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
ymohoh发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
晏啊发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Baylin发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
大模型的应助被半江渔火采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
呆鹅发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
小情绪发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
chujiu发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Dyue发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Owen的应助被Zoe采纳,获得30
11秒前
11秒前
kkk发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
归途发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
彭于晏的应助被byemaxf采纳,获得10
17秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被大胆楷瑞采纳,获得10
17秒前
无极微光的应助被直率雪曼采纳,获得20
18秒前
ljxy完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
土豆完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
大方的蓝完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
小泽关注了科研通微信公众号
21秒前
激情的诗柳完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
海子完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
充电宝的应助被kkk采纳,获得10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Arbitrage Theory in Discrete and Continuous Time 500
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: Waves 0-11, 1998-2024 300
2026-2030年中國基因檢測行業市場前瞻與未來投資戰略分析報告 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7826007
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9352172
关于积分的说明 20565825
捐赠科研通 7419442
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3334997
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2480178
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2355486