结构方程建模
多级模型
心理学
调解
标准化
工具箱
代表(政治)
计算机科学
计量经济学
心理信息
机器学习
数学
梅德林
操作系统
程序设计语言
法学
政治
政治学
作者
Thomas Ledermann,David A. Kenny
摘要
Multilevel modeling (MLM) and structural equation modeling (SEM) are the dominant methods for the analysis of dyadic data. Both methods are extensively reviewed for the widely used actor-partner interdependence model and the dyadic growth curve model, as well as other less frequently adopted models, including the common fate model and the mutual influence model. For each method, we discuss the analysis of distinguishable and indistinguishable members, the treatment of missing data, the standardization of effects, and tests of mediation. Even though there has been some blending of the 2 methods, each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, thus both should be in the toolbox of dyadic researchers. (PsycINFO Database Record
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI