公司治理
企业社会责任
剑
Nexus(标准)
业务
普通最小二乘法
分位数回归
证券交易所
高科技
实证研究
会计
经济
财务
计量经济学
哲学
操作系统
认识论
生物
嵌入式系统
计算机科学
法学
生态学
政治学
作者
Xiaodong Teng,Kun‐Shan Wu,Lopin Kuo,Bao‐Guang Chang
出处
期刊:Oeconomia Copernicana
[Institute of Economic Research, Polish Economic Society Branch in Toruń, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management at Nicolaus]
日期:2023-06-30
卷期号:14 (2): 511-549
被引量:12
摘要
Research background: Corporate risk-taking (CRT) is crucial to a business's survival and performance and is a driving force for sustainable development. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices are critical to firm profits when considering sustainable economic growth; however, they can also be the cause of financial burdens. It is, therefore, crucial to assess the relationship between a company's ESG performance and its risk-taking. Purpose of the article: Considering the controversial results of empirical studies on the relationship between ESG and CRT, this study aims to theoretically and empirically investigate the curvilinear nexus between ESG practices and CRT within Taiwan's high-tech industry. Methods: Ordinary least square regression and quantile regression analysis was applied to investigate the curvilinear ESG-CRT relationship. The empirical studies were conducted in 38 high-tech companies on the Taiwan Stock Exchange that disclosed ESG information between 2005 and 2020, with a total of 437 firm-year observations. Findings & value added: Quantile regression estimation results reveal the ESG-CRT nexus is U-shaped (convex). Both the environmental and social pillar's relationship with CRT is nonlinear and U-shaped, whereas the governance pillar has no significant relationship with CRT. Overall, a comprehensive view is provided that shows ESG practices can have a double-edged sword effect on CRT. It is suggested that high-tech companies in Taiwan should avoid ESG practices becoming a tool for managements' self-interest. More information of ESG practices should be disclosed to stakeholders to ensure they are given full credit for the positive impact they have on capital allocation. Regulators guide firms to surpass the threshold of the U-shaped effect and take into consideration the whole benefits of stakeholders when they allocate existing resources toward environmental and social endeavors.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI