The Efficacy of Split-Dose Bowel Preparations for Polyp Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 荟萃分析 胃肠病学 内科学
作者
Kathleen Zawaly,Colin Rumbolt,Ahmed M Abou-Setta,Christine Neilson,Rasheda Rabbani,Ryan Zarychanski,Harminder Singh
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:114 (6): 884-892 被引量:40
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000155
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Split-dose bowel preparation leads to superior colon cleansing for colonoscopy. However, the magnitude of benefit in detecting colonic polyps is uncertain. We performed a systematic review to synthesize the data on whether using a split-dose bowel preparation regimen improves the detection of polyps when compared with other dosing methods or regimen products. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases (from the inception to June 2017) for randomized controlled trials that assessed the following: split-dose vs day-before, split-dose vs same-day (as colonoscopy), or different types of split-dose regimens for patients undergoing colonoscopy. We excluded studies limited to inpatients, children, or individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. We compared the number of patients undergoing colonoscopy with recorded detection of polyps, adenomas, advanced adenomas, sessile serrated polyps (SSPs), right colonic adenomas, right colonic polyps, or right colonic SSPs. RESULTS: Twenty-eight trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria (8,842 participants). Of the seven trials comparing split-dose vs day-before bowel preparation regimens, there was an increased detection rate of adenomas (risk ratio (RR) 1.26, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.10–1.44; 4 trials; 1,258 participants), advanced adenomas (RR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.22–1.92; 3 trials; 1,155 participants), and SSPs (RR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.21–5.09; 2 trials; 1,045 participants). Pooled estimates from 8 trials (1,587 participants) evaluating split-dose vs same-day bowel preparations yielded no evidence of statistical difference. For various split-dose vs split-dose trials, 14 fulfilled the criteria (5,496 participants) and no superior split-regimen was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with day-before bowel preparation regimens, split-dose bowel preparations regimens increase the detection of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and have the greatest benefit in SSP detection.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
啦啦啦啦啦完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
Jinny完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
务觅发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
慕青的应助被刘红意采纳,获得10
2秒前
蜂蜜柚子发布了新的文献求助100
3秒前
ea的应助被坦率白萱采纳,获得10
3秒前
顺利舟发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
优雅的蛋挞关注了科研通微信公众号
5秒前
5秒前
失语发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被臭洋洋采纳,获得10
7秒前
Jinny发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被tiao采纳,获得10
8秒前
lijunlin完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
orixero的应助被jijiguo采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
ice完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
甘甘甘甘的应助被加贝采纳,获得10
12秒前
rrrrroxie的应助被蛙蛙采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
DOC_XIONG的应助被zou采纳,获得20
13秒前
李照普发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
Afeng发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Tommy发布了新的文献求助80
14秒前
14秒前
臭洋洋发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被虚心远侵采纳,获得30
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
胖宝宝哈基米完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
一口一完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
仁爱冰凡发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
布谷发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
英俊雁兰发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals 888
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Holistic Discourse Analysis, Second Edition by Robert E. Longacre (2012-09-10) 666
Final Report for the 2-D Test of Model 901 Rotor and Wing Airfoils (BSWT 592) 528
Berberine regulates the TLR4 signaling pathway to suppress hypoxia-induced proliferation and migration of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells 520
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 物理 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 心理学 细胞生物学 无机化学 电极 光电子学 人工智能
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7885661
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9398200
关于积分的说明 20825485
捐赠科研通 7487912
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3356272
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2495118
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2384153