计算机科学
最小边界框
多边形(计算机图形学)
跳跃式监视
分割
任务(项目管理)
合成孔径雷达
矩形
人工智能
遥感
计算机视觉
数据挖掘
图像(数学)
帧(网络)
地质学
电信
系统工程
工程类
数学
几何学
作者
Tianwen Zhang,Xiaoling Zhang,Jianwei Li,Xiaowo Xu,Baoyou Wang,Xu Zhan,Yanqin Xu,Xiao Ke,Tianjiao Zeng,Hao Su,Israr Ahmad,Dece Pan,Chang Liu,Yue Zhou,Jun Shi,Shunjun Wei
出处
期刊:Remote Sensing
[Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
日期:2021-09-15
卷期号:13 (18): 3690-3690
被引量:516
摘要
SAR Ship Detection Dataset (SSDD) is the first open dataset that is widely used to research state-of-the-art technology of ship detection from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery based on deep learning (DL). According to our investigation, up to 46.59% of the total 161 public reports confidently select SSDD to study DL-based SAR ship detection. Undoubtedly, this situation reveals the popularity and great influence of SSDD in the SAR remote sensing community. Nevertheless, the coarse annotations and ambiguous standards of use of its initial version both hinder fair methodological comparisons and effective academic exchanges. Additionally, its single-function horizontal-vertical rectangle bounding box (BBox) labels can no longer satisfy the current research needs of the rotatable bounding box (RBox) task and the pixel-level polygon segmentation task. Therefore, to address the above two dilemmas, in this review, advocated by the publisher of SSDD, we will make an official release of SSDD based on its initial version. SSDD’s official release version will cover three types: (1) a bounding box SSDD (BBox-SSDD), (2) a rotatable bounding box SSDD (RBox-SSDD), and (3) a polygon segmentation SSDD (PSeg-SSDD). We relabel ships in SSDD more carefully and finely, and then explicitly formulate some strict using standards, e.g., (1) the training-test division determination, (2) the inshore-offshore protocol, (3) the ship-size reasonable definition, (4) the determination of the densely distributed small ship samples, and (5) the determination of the densely parallel berthing at ports ship samples. These using standards are all formulated objectively based on the using differences of existing 75 (161 × 46.59%) public reports. They will be beneficial for fair method comparison and effective academic exchanges in the future. Most notably, we conduct a comprehensive data analysis on BBox-SSDD, RBox-SSDD, and PSeg-SSDD. Our analysis results can provide some valuable suggestions for possible future scholars to further elaborately design DL-based SAR ship detectors with higher accuracy and stronger robustness when using SSDD.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI