医学
低分子肝素
外科
养生
置信区间
肝素
前瞻性队列研究
相对风险
桥接(联网)
麻醉
内科学
计算机网络
计算机科学
作者
Vittorio Pengo,Umberto Cucchini,Gentian Denas,Nicoletta Erba,Giuliana Guazzaloca,L. La Rosa,Valeria Micheli,Sophie Testa,R. Frontoni,Domenico Prisco,Giovanni Nante,Sabino Iliceto
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2009-05-26
卷期号:119 (22): 2920-2927
被引量:154
标识
DOI:10.1161/circulationaha.108.823211
摘要
BACKGROUND: Bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin is usually recommended in patients who must stop oral anticoagulants before surgical or invasive procedures. To date, there is no universally accepted bridging regimen tailored to the patient's thromboembolic risk. This prospective inception cohort management study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of an individualized bridging protocol applied to outpatients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Oral anticoagulants were stopped 5 days before the procedure. Low-molecular-weight heparin was started 3 to 4 days before surgery and continued for 6 days after surgery at 70 anti-factor Xa U/kg twice daily in high-thromboembolic-risk patients and prophylactic once-daily doses in moderate- to low-risk patients. Oral anticoagulation was resumed the day after the procedure with a boost dose of 50% for 2 days and maintenance doses afterward. The patients were followed up for 30 days. Of the 1262 patients included in the study (only 15% had mechanical valves), 295 (23.4%) were high-thromboembolic-risk patients and 967 (76.6%) were moderate- to low-risk patients. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were 5 thromboembolic events (0.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.1 to 0.9), all in high-thromboembolic-risk patients. There were 15 major (1.2%; 95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 2.0) and 53 minor (4.2%; 95% confidence interval, 3.2 to 5.5) bleeding episodes. Major bleeding was associated with twice-daily low-molecular-weight heparin administration (high-risk patients) but not with the bleeding risk of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This management bridging protocol, tailored to patients' thromboembolic risk, appears to be feasible, effective, and safe for many patients, but safety in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves has not been conclusively established.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI