Dopamine versus norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock

医学 相对风险 随机对照试验 观察研究 研究异质性 荟萃分析 感染性休克 置信区间 内科学 漏斗图 出版偏见 麻醉 败血症
作者
Daniel De Backer,César Aldecoa,Hassane Njimi,Jean‐Louis Vincent
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:40 (3): 725-730 被引量:353
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31823778ee
摘要

There has long-been controversy about the possible superiority of norepinephrine compared to dopamine in the treatment of shock. The objective was to evaluate the effects of norepinephrine and dopamine on outcome and adverse events in patients with septic shock.A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases, and of Google Scholar, up to June 30, 2011.All studies providing information on the outcome of patients with septic shock treated with dopamine compared to norepinephrine were included. Observational and randomized trials were analyzed separately. Because time of outcome assessment varied among trials, we evaluated 28-day mortality or closest estimate. Heterogeneity among trials was assessed using the Cochrane Q homogeneity test. A Forest plot was constructed and the aggregate relative risk of death was computed. Potential publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.We retrieved five observational (1,360 patients) and six randomized (1,408 patients) trials, totaling 2,768 patients (1,474 who received norepinephrine and 1,294 who received dopamine). In observational studies, among which there was significant heterogeneity (p < .001), there was no difference in mortality (relative risk, 1.09; confidence interval, 0.84-1.41; p = .72). A sensitivity analysis identified one trial as being responsible for the heterogeneity; after exclusion of that trial, no heterogeneity was observed and dopamine administration was associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk, 1.23; confidence interval, 1.05-1.43; p < .01). In randomized trials, for which no heterogeneity or publication bias was detected (p = .77), dopamine was associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk, 1.12; confidence interval, 1.01-1.20; p = .035). In the two trials that reported arrhythmias, these were more frequent with dopamine than with norepinephrine (relative risk, 2.34; confidence interval, 1.46-3.77; p = .001).In patients with septic shock, dopamine administration is associated with greater mortality and a higher incidence of arrhythmic events compared to norepinephrine administration.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
103921wjk发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
pluto应助快乐的天磊采纳,获得20
1秒前
筱诸雄完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
如意草丛完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
朝阳CAAS完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
达不溜qp发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
星辰大海应助qvB采纳,获得10
8秒前
鹿冶完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
NexusExplorer应助悦耳的风华采纳,获得10
11秒前
kento完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
醒醒发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
杜11发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
鹿子完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
寒生完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
21秒前
21秒前
小灰灰完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
强健的冰旋完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
ly发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
zyj123发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
xiaojingbao发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
悲凉的冬天完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
27秒前
丘比特应助谨慎的咖啡豆采纳,获得10
27秒前
27秒前
28秒前
28秒前
Arvilzzz发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
30秒前
30秒前
CodeCraft应助郁奥古采纳,获得10
30秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3778170
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3323851
关于积分的说明 10215999
捐赠科研通 3039020
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1667747
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798383
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758339