Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation: 24-Month Results From the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Trial

医学 去神经支配 临床试验 期限(时间) 内科学 心脏病学 外科 量子力学 物理
作者
David E. Kandzari,Felix Mahfoud,Raymond R. Townsend,Kazuomi Kario,Michael A. Weber,Roland E. Schmieder,Konstantinos Tsioufis,Stuart Pocock,Minglei Liu,Vanessa DeBruin,Sandeep Brar,Michael Böhm
出处
期刊:Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:18 (7): e015194-e015194 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.125.015194
摘要

BACKGROUND: Six-month results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-Electrode Renal Denervation System) demonstrated that renal denervation (RDN) reduced office blood pressure (BP), and not 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP, compared with sham control in hypertensive patients. In this prespecified analysis of the ON MED trial, long-term changes in BP, antihypertensive drug use, and safety outcomes through 24 months are compared between RDN and sham control groups. METHODS: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, blinded trial enrolling 337 patients globally from 56 clinical centers. Eligible patients had an office systolic BP of 150 to 180 mm Hg, a diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg, and a 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP of 140 to 170 mm Hg. Patients were randomized to RDN or a sham control procedure and were prescribed a stable regimen of 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications through 6 months. After 6 months, patients and physicians were unblinded with permitted changes to antihypertensive therapy, and control patients were permitted to cross over. Crossover patients had their last observations carried forward as part of the control group. Statistical analyses were conducted on the population as randomized. RESULTS: At 24 months, the RDN group experienced significantly greater mean reductions in ambulatory systolic BP (−12.1±15.3 mm Hg [n=176] versus −7.0±13.1 mm Hg [n=33]; difference: −5.7 mm Hg; P =0.039) and office systolic BP (−17.4±16.1 mm Hg [n=187] versus −9.0±19.4 mm Hg [n=35]; difference: −8.7 mm Hg; P =0.0034) compared with sham controls. At 24 months, antihypertensive medications increased significantly more in the sham group (1.7 versus 2.7) compared with the RDN group (1.8 versus 2.4; P =0.046). Sensitivity analyses accounting for missing sham patient BP values due to crossover yielded consistent results in favor of RDN for 24-hour ambulatory ( P =0.023) and office systolic BP ( P <0.0001). Clinically adverse events were rare, with no instances of renal artery stenosis through 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: RDN produced significantly greater ambulatory and office systolic BP reductions at 24 months compared with sham control, despite higher antihypertensive medication use in the control group. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02439775.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
舒婷发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
优美的冰巧完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
炙热秋翠发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
FashionBoy应助Moshans采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
4秒前
4秒前
野猪发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
7秒前
昔愿念发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
山了个山发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
爱学习发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
drughunter009发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
17完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
打打应助忆落采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
zq发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
核桃应助烙铁来了采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
呱牛发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
舒婷完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
完美的电脑完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
发嗲的向雪完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
喵脆角发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
zq完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
徐徐发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
kuzzi完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
hu发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
Akim应助小万采纳,获得10
22秒前
机灵紫伊完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
栀暖棠深发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
晶种分解过程与铝酸钠溶液混合强度关系的探讨 8888
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
The Sage Handbook of Digital Labour 600
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6416919
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8236033
关于积分的说明 17494378
捐赠科研通 5469733
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2889692
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1866647
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1703773